Summary: With science proving to be an easy target lately for those looking to politicize it, what lasting harm is done to the public discourse and society's faith in anything the research community has to report in those rare instances when unsubstantiated, misleading or unethically crafted papers clear a respected journal's peer review process? Heather Hill a principle author of a rebuttal letter to one such troubling peer-reviewed paper on orcas joins researcher Jason Bruck to discuss the implications for us all.
