Applied Curiosity Lab Radio

How do you explain how you choose to spend your time? We're extremely glad that you choose to spend a little time with us! This week we discuss explanations. What qualifications must an explanation have for you to find it valid? How fast do you jump to conclusions? How often do you realize that the explanation you believed was incorrect? Do you ever consider that the real explanation might require knowledge we don't yet have access to? Discuss, debate, and dissect with us! The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. This week's Curiosity Bite:   How often is there really no other explanation?   In this episode...Curious Questions asked and answered Why is it so important that we find explanations for everything? How do we get more comfortable with uncertainty? Once you've settled on an explanation that makes sense, how often do you generate more explanations? Whose explanations are you most likely to believe? Why must we rely so heavily on tidy stories to provide believable explanations? References Nathan For You episode (hilarious!) Occam's Razor Bias Pizzagate Conspiracy Theory of Mind Biminy P-hacking and Data Dredging Dancing Plague of 1518 Social Proof in action (dancing on the grassy knoll) Don Decker (Rain Man) Jean Hillyard (Frozen Woman) Elevator (social proof experiment) Thanks for Listening! To share your thoughts: * Leave a note in the comment section below or Tweet with #ACLR and we'll find you. * Share this show on Twitter or Facebook and your very own favorite social site. To help out the show: * Leave an honest review on iTunes. Your ratings and reviews really help and we read each one. * Subscribe on iTunes or

Welcome back to Applied Curiosity Lab Radio you adventurous humans! What is greatness? Is greatness the size or the size of impact? Do you recognize greatness when you see it? How? Can greatness exist in anonymity? How are you great? Who can you think of who has had greatness thrust upon them...but is not that great? Can you guess why I have Sean Spicer to thank for a precious gift? Discuss, debate, and dissect with us! The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. This week's Curiosity Bite: Is anyone really that much greater than you? How can you interpret this Curiosity Bite differently with the emphasis on different bolded words: Is anyone really that much greater than you? In this episode...Curious Questions asked and answered Is greatest the same as world-class? What does it mean to be world-class? What's greatness? What's human greatness? What's the downside of venerating others? Is there an upside? Should an NBA player be allowed to miss a free-throw? Are all people created equal? Was anyone wildly shocked by the most recent Michael Jackson accusations? How does one become a Swami? References Imposter Syndrome Imposter Syndrome research study Applied Curiosity Workshops Greatness Thanks for Listening! To share your thoughts: * Leave a note in the comment section below or Tweet with #ACLR and we'll find you. * Share this show on Twitter or Facebook and your very own favorite social site. To help out the show: * Leave an honest review on iTunes. Your ratings and reviews really help and we read each one. * Subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher. * Subscribe to Applied Curiosity Lab YouTube Join the Tribe of the Curious. Special thanks to listener, Milo for sharing Curiosity Bites research and ideas. Thanks for joining us this week. Until next time!

Welcome back to Applied Curiosity Lab Radio you adventurous humans! How often do you get what you expect from what you buy? What has the biggest impact on whether you get what you expect from what you buy? Should we value experiences more than we value stuff? Why? What influences your buying decisions?   Discuss, debate, and dissect with us! The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. This week's Curiosity Bite: Did you get the best result from what you purchased last? What was your last purchase? What did you expect from it? Why'd you buy it?   In this episode...Curious Questions asked and answered What are the long term effects of your buying decisions? Do you value things that cost more? Where does the product end and the experience of owning it begin? How do you value ownership versus access? Ideally, should your purchases really "spark joy"? References Brain-wine study from National Institutes of Health Corfu (Here's where it is, Jennifer. Let's go!) Apple's failed decision to include U2 on the iPhone 6 Loaf of bread pillow Inflatable motorized pool floater Portable pizza pouch Nerd Wax Children Learn What They Live poem Thanks for Listening! To share your thoughts: * Leave a note in the comment section below or Tweet with #ACLR and we'll find you. * Share this show on Twitter or Facebook and your very own favorite social site.

Welcome back to Applied Curiosity Lab Radio! You're lost with a dead cell phone and no one to help. What would you do? How do you decide who and what to trust? On this show we don't always agree, but as the older sister and the one that writes the show notes, I can say with certainty that I'm right 97% of the time. Let's see if Jennifer reads these show notes! :) (Check out the link in the references below to see Jennifer back in the day as Juke Joint Jezebel) Discuss, debate, and dissect with us! The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. What’s more important to you? What you know…or how you think? Do you say you value how you think more than you value what you know? How much time to you set aside for thinking, developing how you think? This week's Curiosity Bite: If you were lost in a new city with $20, a dead cell phone, and no one who believed or wanted to help you, what would you do? Really, what would you do? Have a listen and let us know what you think! In this episode...Curious Questions asked and answered Would you loan your cell phone to a stranger? What do you use to decide not to trust a stranger? What's intuition and why do you think you can trust yours? What's the most dangerous characteristic of untrustworthy people? You're lost. Your cell phone battery is dead. No one will help you. What would you do? How do you decide who and what to trust? Do you trust yourself the right amount? References We mentioned that Jennifer leaped at the chance to tour the world with the industrial band KMFDM? You can hear Jennifer in this vintage KMFDM Juke Joint Jezebel video...but can you spot her? Kitty Genovese and The Bystander Effect The Gift of Fear: Survival Signals That Protect Us from Violence by Gavin De Becker Thanks for Listening! To share your thoughts: * Leave a note in the comment section below or Tweet with #ACLR and we'll find you. * Share this show on Twitter or Facebook and your very own favorite social site. To help out the show: * Leave an honest review on iTunes. Your ratings and reviews really help and we read each one. * Subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher. * Subscribe to Applied Curiosity Lab YouTube Join the Tribe of the ...

Come in you relentlessly curious adventurers! Do you complain more or less than average? Are your complaints valuable? How do you value your own complaints? How do you value other's complaints? What's your favorite complaint? How often do you complain to seek commiseration versus to seek a solution? Discuss, debate, and dissect with us! The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. What’s more important to you? What you know…or how you think? Do you say you value how you think more than you value what you know? How much time to you set aside for thinking, developing how you think? This week's Curiosity Bite: What's something that you complain about that you never try to do anything about? What's something that you don't complain about but you actually do something about? Related experiment: Today, only complain about things that you do nothing about. Tomorrow, do the opposite? What is the opposite? In this episode...Curious Questions asked and (maybe) answered... Is doing something about something better than doing nothing? Always? Sometimes? Never? How effective are your complaints? Are you strategic about to whom you complain? What's the most common desired outcome to your complaining to others? How often do you modify what you complain about to manage others' impression of you? References Complaining, For Your Health   Thanks for Listening! To share your thoughts: * Leave a note in the comment section below or Tweet with #ACLR and we'll find you. * Share this show on Twitter or Facebook and your very own favorite social site. To help out the show: * Leave an honest review on iTunes. Your ratings and reviews really help and we read each one. * Subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher. * Subscribe to Applied Curiosity Lab YouTube Join the Tribe of the Curious. Special thanks for those of you who have shared Curiosity Bites responses and ideas. Thanks for joining us this week. Until next time!

Welcome back to ACLR where we're tackling an issue that will become increasingly important in the age of AI: Purpose & relevance. Is it enough to feel that we matter? How do we preserve what makes us feel that we matter? If Prozac can make us happy, why can't a pill (or a implanted chip) make us feel economically relevant...even when we aren't? What's basic and what's universal about Universal Basic Needs? What's basic and what's universal about Universal Basic Income (UBI)? Should we talk about Basic Universal Access? Discuss, debate, and dissect with us! The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. What’s more important to you? What you know…or how you think? Do you say you value how you think more than you value what you know? How much time to you set aside for thinking, developing how you think? This week's Curiosity Bite:   Do you need to feel economic relevance to feel valuable? What do you think of Yuval Noah Harari's equation: B + C + D = HH (Biological knowledge + Computer power + Data  = Human Hacking)? In this episode...Curious Questions asked and answered... What is economic relevance? How are purpose and passion different? How do they contribute to value differently? How do you feel valuable? What are the two sides of the fairness coin? How do you separate emotion from decision? Are you more or less susceptible to loss aversion than average? What's your favorite pre-existing framework? ...your favorite "ism"? References Andrew Yang's policies Loss Aversion Universal Basic Access (Let's Define This Now!) Thanks for Listening! To share your thoughts: * Leave a note in the comment section below or Tweet with #ACLR and we'll find you. * Share this show on Twitter or Facebook and your very own favorite social site. To help out the show: * Leave an honest review on iTunes. Your ratings and reviews really help and we read each one. * Subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher. * Subscribe to Applied Curiosity Lab YouTube Join the Tribe of the Curious. Special thanks for those of you who have shared Curiosity Bites responses and ideas. Thanks for joining us this week. Until next time!

What does it mean to be in a cult? What are common indoctrination techniques? Would you recognize these techniques if they were being used on you? How do you know if you're in a cult? Discuss, debate, and dissect with us! The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. What’s more important to you? What you know…or how you think? Do you say you value how you think more than you value what you know? How much time to you set aside for thinking, developing how you think? This week's Curiosity Bite: What would you do if you found out that you and your friends are perceived to be members of a cult? In this episode...Curious Questions asked and answered... How do you define a cult? How do you think about cult versus cult of personality? What do you check to see if you've slipped into cult membership? How is a sorority or fraternity like a cult? How are they different? What's the difference between shame and guilt? Is a complete lack of skepticism a sign of cult-ish thinking? Are you in a cult? Have you ever been in a cult? How do you help your kids avoid joining a cult? References Christian counter-cult movement Rajneeshpuram Heaven's Gate Hare Krishna Thanks for Listening! To share your thoughts: * Leave a note in the comment section below or Tweet with #ACLR and we'll find you. * Share this show on Twitter or Facebook and your very own favorite social site. To help out the show: * Leave an honest review on iTunes. Your ratings and reviews really help and we read each one. * Subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher. * Subscribe to Applied Curiosity Lab YouTube Join the Tribe of the Curious. Special thanks for those of you who have shared Curiosity Bites responses and ideas. Thanks for joining us this week. Until next time!

Welcome to this special episode of Applied Curiosity Lab Radio, where we're focusing the lens of curiosity on...The Mueller Report. Wait! Why should you care about The Mueller Report? Still? Enter... Professor Kimberly Wehle, The Constitution Demystifier. Kim is a world-class expert in translating complex legal issues into plain English...for those of us who want to know how the law actually works. Is this a "liberal" perspective? No. Is this a "conservative" perspective? No. "It's not a political question. It's not a blue versus red question. It's a right versus wrong question." Kimberly Wehle How much is this about the President and how much is this about the Presidency? In this episode of ACLR, we're unpacking the key takeaways and what you REALLY need to know about The Mueller Report. Discuss, debate, and dissect with us! The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. What’s more important to you? What you know…or how you think? Do you say you value how you think more than you value what you know? How much time to you set aside for thinking, developing how you think? This week's Curiosity Bite:   Can You Overcome Confirmation Bias?   In this episode...Curious Questions asked and answered... ...but first, corrections: 1. On October 20, 1973, President Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus to fire Special Counsel Archibald Cox, but both men refused and resigned their posts in protest. The role of attorney general then fell to Solicitor General Robert Bork, who complied with Nixon’s request and dismissed Cox. 2. The two indictments against the Russians were Feb 2018 and July 2018 (not June & July 2018). Curious about impeachable offenses? Here they are: SECTION 4. The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. Which one is you? 1. You know what you know and you don’t want to hear from people who don’t get it. 2. You have more important things to do and think about. 3. You’re fed up and disgusted...with it all...with our countries leaders, the system, everything. 4. You’re fascinated with politics and the Mueller Report is, at least, somewhat interesting. How should we think about the hierarchy of laws in the US? Why do we have this Mueller Report? What's the difference between conspiracy, collusion, and coordination? What about complicity? What are "rocks in the wheelbarrow"? Why can't a US President be indicted...or can they? How can we think about the two parts of The Mueller Report? Did the Russians hack our brains? Did they hack your brain? Are we in a constitutional crisis? References Kimberly Wehle Kimberly Wehle in The Bulwark Kimberly Wehle on Twitter Kimberly Wehle in The Hill

Welcome back, curiosity seekers. What do you see as a warning sign that others may see as an opportunity? What do you see as an opportunity that others may see as a warning sign? Do you value your intuition to the point where you are less curious about its effectiveness? When you think about opportunity, what comes to mind? Investments? Adventures? Relationships?   Discuss, debate, and dissect with us! The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. What’s more important to you? What you know…or how you think? Do you say you value how you think more than you value what you know? How much time to you set aside for thinking, developing how you think? This week's Curiosity Bite:   How Do You Tell the Difference Between a Great Opportunity and a Warning Sign?   In this episode...Curious Questions asked and answered... How should we think about warning signs versus opportunities? Should we live our lives in fear of warning signs? Do people who see more warning signs encounter fewer dangers? How do men and women differ in how they answer this Curiosity Bite? What does it mean to focus on the big picture? References Leaving Neverland  Gaslighting  History of Ponzi schemes Availability heuristic Sunk cost bias Thanks for Listening! To share your thoughts: * Leave a note in the comment section below or Tweet with #ACLR and we'll find you. * Share this show on Twitter or Facebook and your very own favorite social site. To help out the show: * Leave an honest review on iTunes. Your ratings and reviews really help and we read each one. * Subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher. * Subscribe to Applied Curiosity Lab YouTube Join the Tribe of the Curious. Special thanks for those of you who have shared Curiosity Bites responses and ideas. Thanks for joining us this week. Until next time!

Ready to discuss, dissect, and debate another delectable Curiosity Bite? Glad you relentlessly curious adventurers are here to tackle these topics with us. How do you determine what's valuable or entertaining enough to share? Is this different for what you share in-person and what you share online? How are your life experiences influenced by your plans to document or share? When you watch interesting videos and photos, do you consider who was holding the camera? Do you consider what the person who posts wants you to believe or feel? Do you think that documenting your life makes it harder to change your mind? Discuss, debate, and dissect with us! The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. What’s more important to you? What you know…or how you think? Do you say you value how you think more than you value what you know? How much time to you set aside for thinking, developing how you think? This week's Curiosity Bite: What's the right ratio of experiencing to documenting life? In this episode...Curious Questions asked and (maybe) answered... While we're documenting our lives, what are we giving away to the algorithms? Is documentation of our lives risky? Why do people like to share? How is your documenting influenced by the possibility of sharing? How do you determine what photos or videos to believe? Does documenting your life make it harder to explore new parts of your identity...or change your mind? Do you feel obligated to share? References Anchors of Memory Experiencing versus remembering self How memories influence happiness Ultimate Travel Guide to Japan for the Relentlessly Curious (podcast) Thanks for Listening! To share your thoughts: * Leave a note in the comment section below or Tweet with #ACLR and we'll find you. * Share this show on Twitter or Facebook and your very own favorite social site. To help out the show: * Leave an honest review on iTunes. Your ratings and reviews really help and we read each one. * Subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher. * Subscribe to Applied Curiosity Lab YouTube Join the Tribe of the Curious.

Hey relentlessly curious adventurers, do you think that it's good to buy into the adage that you're only as old as you feel? Why? What's wrong with being old? Why is being considered young better than being considered old? Has it always been this way? If not, what changed? If so, is this ageism... or something else?   Discuss, debate, and dissect with us! The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. What’s more important to you? What you know…or how you think? Do you say you value how you think more than you value what you know? How much time to you set aside for thinking, developing how you think? This week's Curiosity Bite: What Does It Mean to Die Too Soon? What's a long life? In this episode...Curious Questions asked and (maybe) answered... Is getting old bad? Why do we assume that being told, "You're not old!" is a good thing? What's wrong with being considered old? Is ageism universal? Can you spot your own ageism? What's the difference between life span and health span? What does it mean to be healthy? If you could learn when you are likely to die, would you? If you could learn exactly when you will die, would you? References Life span versus health span Time to Death Clock The Ticktock of the Death Clock AI will be able to predict when you will die. Thanks for Listening! To share your thoughts: * Leave a note in the comment section below or Tweet with #ACLR and we'll find you. * Share this show on Twitter or Facebook and your very own favorite social site. To help out the show: * Leave an honest review on iTunes. Your ratings and reviews really help and we read each one. * Subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher. * Subscribe to Applied Curiosity Lab YouTube Join the Tribe of the Curious. Special thanks for those of you who have shared Curiosity Bites responses and ideas. Thanks for joining us this week. Until next time!

Glad you're here you curious adventurers. We're tackling a delicate topic this week: skin color. The value of elevating curiosity will be clear. When thinking about the color of your skin, what's the right amount? What are you missing when you ignore impact to acknowledge intent? What are you missing when you ignore intent to only acknowledge impact? What's more important, intent or impact? Discuss, debate, and dissect with us! The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. What’s more important to you? What you know…or how you think? Do you say you value how you think more than you value what you know? How much time to you set aside for thinking, developing how you think? This week's Curiosity Bite: How often do you think about the color of your skin? More than you have in the past? Less? What's the right amount of time to devote to thinking about it? Is it a luxury to decide? In this episode...Curious Questions asked and answered... Is thinking about the color of your skin the same as thinking about race? Ethnicity? Nationality? Religion? Should ignorance be an excuse? How do you determine what offends you? What should offend you? How do you think about white privilege? How can you think about white privilege? Should you think about it? What's more important, intent or impact? How do you think about white privilege and class? What does awareness of privilege mean? What's the right amount to think about the color of other's skin? What's the opposite of white privilege? How important is it to recognize that different skin colors have different privileges? Finally! References White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack by Peggy McIntosh. It's a white privilege checklist. Identity and Honesty (aka The Sam Harris – Ezra Klein debate) Tru-Colour Bandages (in case you're tired of bandages that only match one skin-tone shade) Thanks for Listening! To share your thoughts: * Leave a note in the comment section below or Tweet with #ACLR and we'll find you. * Share this show on Twitter or Facebook and your very own favorite social site. To help out the show: * Leave an honest review on iTunes. Your ratings and reviews really help and we read each one. * Subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher. * Subscribe to

You relentlessly curious adventurers are the most interesting humans. Glad you're here. How much can you trust yourself? How self-reliant are you? Are you more self-reliant in the country or the city? To live without a smart phone, what adjustments would you make? In the last 27 months, what's the longest you've gone without a cell phone? What should you know how to do that you have not gotten around to learning...because it's easy for someone or something to do it for you? Discuss, debate, and dissect with us! The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. What’s more important to you? What you know…or how you think? Do you say you value how you think more than you value what you know? How much time to you set aside for thinking, developing how you think? This week's Curiosity Bite: If you were lost in a new city with $20, a dead cell phone battery, and people who didn't believe you or want to help you, what would you do? Hint: No one at any store wants to help. Remember, no one believes you. In this episode...Curious Questions asked and answered... Would you loan your cell phone to a stranger? How do you decide whether or not you can trust people? How much do you rely on how you look? Is it possible to be totally self-reliant? What informs your intuition? References Natalie Portman movie, Where the Heart Is Affect Heuristic Availability Heuristic KMFDM Bystander Effect The Gift of Fear by Gavin de Becker Thanks for Listening! To share your thoughts: * Leave a note in the comment section below or Tweet with #ACLR and we'll find you. * Share this show on Twitter or Facebook and your very own favorite social site. To help out the show: * Leave an honest review on iTunes. Your ratings and reviews really help and we read each one. * Subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher. * Subscribe to Applied Curiosity Lab YouTube Join the Tribe of the Curious. Special thanks for those of you who have shared Curiosity Bites responses and ideas.

Welcome back to Applied Curiosity Lab Radio, you relentlessly curious adventurers Here's a question to elevate your curiosity for this episode. What's easier for you to see? A. When the wrong person has the right mind, B. When the wrong people have the right mind, C. When the right person has the wrong mind, or D. When the right people have the wrong mind? That's (mostly) what we're talking about. By right mind we mean they're right...about something. Discuss, debate, and dissect with us! The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. What’s more important to you? What you know…or how you think? Do you say you value how you think more than you value what you know? How much time to you set aside for thinking, developing how you think? This week's Curiosity Bite: Do you have the right mind to know when the wrong people have the right mind? Really, do you? Have a listen and let us know what you think! In this episode...Curious Questions asked and answered... Do you have the right mind to know when the right people have the wrong mind? How do you recognize when you're doing the wrong thing? How do you justify bad behavior? Who gets the benefit when you give someone the benefit of the doubt? How do you see ideas through feelings of like and dislike? References Cognitive dissonance The Broken Window Effect Machiavellian  Pygmalion Effect Thanks for Listening! To share your thoughts: * Leave a note in the comment section below or Tweet with #ACLR and we'll find you. * Share this show on Twitter or Facebook and your very own favorite social site. To help out the show: * Leave an honest review on iTunes. Your ratings and reviews really help and we read each one. * Subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher. * Subscribe to Applied Curiosity Lab YouTube Join the Tribe of the Curious. Special thanks for those of you who have shared Curiosity Bites responses and ideas. Thanks for joining us this week. Until next time!

Welcome back to Applied Curiosity Lab Radio. ACLR is the  podcast for the relentlessly curious. This Season (the big 2.0!) I'm joined in the studio by my sister and Applied Curiosity Lab's Chief Experience Producer, Jennifer Felberg. The lens is – and always will be – curiosity. Each week, fun informal conversations center around one delectable Curiosity Bite designed to give your brain the time and ideas to think about thinking, to flex your curiosity muscle… and maybe even… revolutionize the way you think. What’s more important to you? What you know…or how you think? Do you say you value how you think more than you value what you know? How much time to you set aside for thinking, developing how you think? This week's Curiosity Bite: What's Your Favorite Bad Habit? Really, what is it? Have a listen to ours, share yours, and let us know what you think! Thanks for Listening! To share your thoughts: * Leave a note in the comment section below or Tweet with #ACLR and we'll find you. * Share this show on Twitter or Facebook and your very own favorite social site. To help out the show: * Leave an honest review on iTunes. Your ratings and reviews really help and I read each one. * Subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher. * Subscribe to Applied Curiosity Lab YouTube Join the Tribe of the Curious. Special thanks to listener, Jinxser for sharing Curiosity Bites research and ideas. Thanks for joining us this week. Until next time!