New Books in South Asian Studies

Peter RobbView on AmazonRichard Blechynden came to Calcutta in 1782 as a twenty two year old, and stayed there for the rest of his life, working as a surveyor and architect. From 1791 he maintained daily diaries, and it is these that Peter Robb has so magnificently re-worked as Richard Blechynden's Calcutta Diaries, 1791-1822 (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2011, 2 vols). Richard's diaries are quite literally a chronicle of the everyday and the ordinary, what might even be called mundane and the petty, in Calcutta in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. In these diaries Richard talks about his children, his loves, his network of colleagues, helps, acquaintances, what might today be dubbed 'frenemies', people, European, Indian, 'half-caste,' who exasperated him but without whom it was well nigh impossible to function in a city where everyone needed everyone else to get their work done. Peter Robb's edited compendium of these diaries is a record of how social networks operated in a very cosmopolitan city, yet one whose inhabitants were always all too aware of their social, religious, ethnic and economic backgrounds. Sometimes the lines between the personal and the professional blurred, and sometimes favors were given and taken from unlikely persons, and people were not always, by modern standards, ethical, yet in the end everyone managed to establish for themselves a position that would guarantee, if not prosperity, survival.

View on AmazonNineteenth century observers would say that the British Empire was an Islamic one; be that as it may, before Empire there was trade- and lots of it. Nabil Matar and Gerald MacLean's book, Britain and the Islamic World, 1558-1713 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), though, goes beyond trade- there was also lots of curiosity, in Britain and abroad, about the strange new peoples and products  beginning to move more freely across the world than ever before. It is this aspect of British-Muslim interaction – (or more accurately interactions; the Islamic world was vast and encompassed a dizzying diversity of peoples and cultures) that Matar and MacLean emphasise- the wondering, bemused, gleeful, fascinated, at times despairing accounts of travellers, diplomats, traders -and pirates and their captives- as they sought to convey their impressions of the new worlds they encountered. Nor did everyone think the same; not every factor in Surat went fantee, and not every potentate and cleric disapproved of tobacco and coffee, which North Africans and Britons were wont to accuse each other of having introduced to their lands- and some people tried both lifestyles before settling on one- or neither. It was this celebration of the exotic that made the trading ports and cities of early modern Britain and the Islamic powers such fascinating places to be in- and MacLean and Matar's book evokes perfectly the heady atmosphere of the contemporary world.

Jeff SahadeoView on AmazonKonstantin von Kaufmann, Governor-General of Russian Turkestan from 1867 until his death in 1882, wanted to be buried in Tashkent if he died in office; so that, he said, 'all may know that here is true Russian soil, where no Russian need be ashamed to lie.' Certainly not after Kaufmann's efforts- he set out to create a planned city on the lines of St. Petersburg, and in fact  succeeded in creating a 'charming…little European capital' as one traveller said; though that was just restricted to the buildings- local customs Kaufmann left alone and actively discouraged importation of 'Russian' religious customs and culture. Jeff Sahadeo's new book, Russian Colonial Society in Tashkent, 1865-1903 (Indiana University Press, 2010) looks at how Russian colonial administrators went about building Tashkent, sometimes with the help of, and sometimes with resistance from locals,   and the effects of 1905, the Great War and 1917 on a city already greatly transformed after the transition to Russian rule in 1865. So this is a book which takes the reader through the process of creating a 'colonial' city and the negotiations, interactions and engagements it involved- Tashkent was more than just a staging post en route to the Indian Empire. It was a city which housed many distinct groups of people- the Russian colonial elite, to local leaders, the traders and the merchants, and the many Russians who came down to work in this rapidly growing regional capital. Nor did all these people always get on well with each other- but their spats helped shape Tashkent just as much as their collaborations did.

View on AmazonNorth East India is, as Marcus Franke's War and Nationalism in South Asia: The Indian State and the Nagas (Routledge, 2011) all too convincingly demonstrates, often considered peripheral to 'India (or even South Asia) proper.' A densely wooded, sparsely populated tract of hills (in fact the Eastern Himalayas), the moniker refers to the Indian states of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya and Tripura, with the former kingdom of Sikkim often included. This beautifully diverse, hard to reach region is today home to dozens of separatist movements, fighting against what is often referred to as the Government of India's indifference, perhaps hostility, to the cultures and lifestyles of the region- customs and rituals which vary sharply from those of the plains of India. Border disputes with China and Bangladesh, and amongst the states, add to regional instability and have resulted in heavy militarization- Marcus' book talks about the engagement between the Indian governmental apparatus and the Naga people right from the time the British were drawn into these wild hills down to the blockades and skirmishes that attest to the region's uneasy engagement with the Indian political metropole. The Indian State and the Nagas is an excellent, detailed analysis of the political and cultural history of the region, and a great primer for understanding the dynamics of the groups fighting to preserve their tribal identities even as they call for greater economic investment in the region.

View on AmazonEnglish common law is prevalent across large parts of the world; and all thanks to the British Empire. It was not just culture and commerce that came along to the colonies; English law, as Diane Kirkby and Catharine Coleborne's new book, Law, History, Colonialism: The Reach of Empire (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011) demonstrates, made the trip as well, and it was English law that was used to combat many a 'barbarous' (or simply inconvenient) native custom. Of course it didn't go unaltered; English law interacted with local customs and laws, resulting in 'legal syncretism' as local laws were modified and codified and set down in statutes; they dealt with title to land, sovereignty, citizenship, and also more everyday things like whom one could marry, where one could trade, and how one could go about getting an education. Many of these statutes and codes remained in operation throughout decolonization and after and yet endure; legal systems are perhaps one of the strongest continuities between the colonial and the post-colonial state. So this is a very welcome work, analyzing as it does the space where law, history (historiography) and colonialism intersected and engaged with each other.

View on AmazonHorticulture is not an activity normally associated with Empire building. But Eugenia Herbert's book Flora's Empire: British Gardens in India (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011). But 'garden imperialism' was all too common in the Indian subcontinent, as its many conquerors attempted to tame and order a land that seemed simultaneously alien and unwelcoming. The last of these conquerors were the British, and the passion for laying out gardens and otherwise landscaping their surrounds was a trait they shared with those from whom they took over the governance of India, the Great Mughals. Most of the time gardens and landscapes were built to remind the British of home, and many an Anglo-Indian tried to re-create England by planting English flowers- in pots which could be taken along when the civilian was invariably transferred to a new station. But there were times when the British tried to re-create India's past by -recreating Indian gardens. So it was that George Curzon when restoring the Taj added what now seems to be the classic Mughal garden around it; but as Herbert shows, the Taj gardens were not always these austere geometric rows and squares of controlled growth; rather they were overrun with luxuriant tropical verdure that partly threw a veil over the lovely façade of the Taj itself.  Gardens built to evoke memories  thus did not always offer an accurate re-construction of the past, or indeed of places far away.

View on Amazon'Traders to rulers' is an enduring caption insofar as the English East India Company is concerned. But were they ever just traders to start off with, and they eventually morph into mere temporal rulers unconcerned with the dynamics of the global economy?  Philip Stern's book, The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011) explores just this: the changing boundaries and demarcations between corporate bodies and sovereign states, and the 'rightful' spheres of action of each. This is not to suggest that the English East India Company was a sort of half-way house, or that it occupied a zone of hybridity; it was merely that, in those days (as is perhaps increasingly the case again),  the 'business of government'  was often assumed by 'corporations and non-state actors'; and they went about their job just as well as any political government with sovereign powers. So it was that the East India Company's factors, based in coastal entrepôts, built forts, codified law, brought in settlers, collected taxes, waged war, and generally laid down a framework for the governance of the environs they operated in- and carried on trade.  The Company-State couldn't carry on for ever though; as Stern points out,  it eventually became a  casualty of the 'evolving definitions' of what constituted an economic body and what constituted a political body, and eventually ceded all political space to the British Crown, even as its economic avatar just celebrated a quatercentennary of existence.

Alexander MorrisonView on AmazonGreat Britain and Russia faced off across the Pamirs for much of the nineteenth century; their rivalries and animosities often obscuring underlying commonalities; these were, after all, colonial Empires governing 'alien' peoples, and faced much the same problems insofar as maintaining their rule was concerned.  Alexander Morrison's Russian Rule in Samarkand, 1868-1910: A Comparison with British India (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008) does exactly that; traces the issues faced by the Russian administration in the region around Samarkand and the British administration in the Punjab, issues ranging from judicial systems and grassroots administration to dam building and educating the colonized local populace. This is a book that is at once fluent and erudite; its the great strengths are a very detailed bibliography, and an extensive use of Russian archival sources, as well as local sources in Persian; too often has the story of Russia in Central Asia been recounted to an Anglophone audience from the works and thoughts of British colonial administrators. This is also a work that analyses macro, holistic administrative structures and does not rely on the retelling of anecdotes involving flamboyant frontier officials; a recounting that delves behind the sabre-rattling of the Great Game suffices in itself to make this book  a must-read.

View on AmazonFor an empire supposedly founded on the back of trade, not much attention has been paid to how the finances of the British Empire were organized- or to the people who organized them. Chris Poullaos' and Suki Sian's pioneering compendium,  Accountancy and Empire: The British Legacy of Professional Organization (Routledge, 2010), however, changes all that as it examines how Chartered Accountants fought for the right to be so called from Trinidad to India to Malaysia, and how the profession negotiated the change from colonialism to post-colonialism.  Initially it was British Chartered Accountants who went out to work in the Empire, and in time local accounting bodies gradually codified and standardized the accounting profession as it existed in their countries, even as many people continued to travel to England to obtain the British Chartered Accountancy qualification. So Chartered Accountancy was never just about numbers. It might be said that all that should have mattered was that at the end of the day's work, the books should balance; but the profession could not insulate itself from the socio-political context of the world in which it operated.  Close to half a century after the last wave of decolonization, questions linger as to the role the organization and codification of the accountancy profession played in perpetuating British, or 'Western' influence, across the globe – and whether this globalization by default is commendable or not, especially in view of the desirability of integrating world accounting systems.

View on AmazonEveryone knows that the late nineteenth-century Russian Empire was the largest land based empire around, and that it was growing yet- at fifty-five square miles a day, no less. But how did Moscow and St. Petersberg go about making the bewildering array of peoples and ethnicities into subjects subject of a Russian empire? Vera Tolz's Russia's Own Orient: The Politics of Identity and Oriental Studies in the late Imperial and Early Soviet Periods (Oxford University Press, 2011) examines 'Orientalism' as it evolved in the Russian metropole, developed by scholars and pedagogues from every corner of the far flung Russian Empire during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. These turn-of-the-century Russian Orientologists (note, not 'Orientalists') saw themselves as 'Empire-savers;' promoting ethnic nationalism, they felt, would only strengthen ultimate allegiance to the Russian Empire.  The result of their efforts was an emphatic celebration of the 'non-European' cultures that made up much of Central Asia and the Caucasus, whose peoples were encouraged to consolidate their ethnic and cultural identities even as they were supposed to be part of a larger Russian entity- a policy that persisted through the many changes of power at the metropole. And even as the Russian state continued to be shaped and influenced by peoples and cultures away from from its political centre, the Orientologists who did so much to integrate this diversity of Russians were themselves influenced by, and counted among their ranks of, people from all over Russia.  Orientology in Russia was then a rejection of the East -West dichotomy, a view that early on anticipated and matched many of the cannons of modern postcolonial scholarship.

Craig LockardView on AmazonA book called Southeast Asia in World History (Oxford University Press, 2009) might seem on the face of it to be out of place on a blog about South Asia. But as Craig Lockard so convincingly demonstrates, this region was shaped by, and in turn gave much to, the rest of the world. Its links with South Asia, with the ancient empires of India, go back to antiquity; and Indian traders in turn were responsible for ferrying many Southeast Asian spices to the rest of the world; curiosity eventually drew the Arabs and then the Portuguese, to the region, thus bringing the world to a place that already boasted of Indic, Sinitic and Pacific peoples and cultures. The nation states of modern Southeast Asia, both mainland and maritime, have continued this proud tradition of welcoming people from across the world; not always without conflict, but this is part of a larger process of acceptance and assimilation that translates into being able to partake of foods from across the world on the streets of Penang and Singapore and Jakarta; of a small city state becoming a global hub insofar as connections, virtual and real, are concerned, and of politicians coming from 'minority' ethnic groups and nobody batting an eyelid. Craig's book shows us how this is the result not of some artificially engineered process, but of an autochthonous tradition of pluralism that has endured over the centuries.

Cecilia Leong-SalobirView on AmazonHobson-Jobson was not just about administration and geopolitics- the language of Empire extended to its culinary endeavours as well. Thus chota hazri, tiffin,  and curry puffs at Peliti's were  the things that sustained an army of  civil servants as they went about registering land records in the United Provinces, negotiating with Malay sultans or checking out logging operations in Sabah. Cecilia Leong-Salobir's book, Food Culture in Colonial Asia: A Taste of Empire (Routledge, 2011),  looks at the gastronomic side of things in Britain's tropical, Asiatic Empire -India, Malaya and Singapore. It looks at the things administrators, soldiers and commercial workers ate on various occasions- in the dak bungalow, on camping tours, at grand dinner parties – and how they went about preparing their victuals- mostly with the help of domestic staff, Muslim, Goan, Malay and Chinese, cooks of whom they had criticisms aplenty to make, yet in the end trusted with the task of cooking for their families.  And they made sure to write down all they gleaned about rustling up pastries and soufflés in lands where rice and chappatis were the staple dishes. Cecilia researched the cookbooks, colonial archives, correspondence, and prepared questionnaires for old Empire hands to come up with a comprehensive report on what the Empire builders ate- and the result is a deliciously detailed work, which explores how the socio-cultural structure of Empire dictated and determined what would be cooked and eaten at specific times and places.

M. BradleyView on AmazonThe Greco-Roman world was the prism through which the British viewed their imperial efforts, and Mark Bradley's compendium Classics and Imperialism in the British Empire (Oxford University Press, 2010) explores the various ways in which this reception of the classics occurred. From museums, to oratorical texts, to theories of race, the classical world was a reference point  for the imperial British.  Bradley's book looks at how the British thought about the classical world at a time when they were confronted by their own role as empire builders. There was the desire to reinforce, to justify their claims to being the greatest imperial power after Rome. There was doubt; the need to reconcile the colonized to their rule even as they learnt how ancient Britons had resisted Roman rule.  There was a certain humbled pride that they had managed to supplant the Romans insofar as claims to being the 'greatest imperial power' were concerned. There was also puzzlement; the jewel in the crown, India, was nothing like any Roman province or territory-how did this place them in relation to the Romans, who after all went about subjugating 'barbarians' as opposed a people with a  highly sophisticated civilization of their own? These are some of the issues that concerned the Britons of the Empire, and that this book analyses with great sensitivity.

Vinayak ChaturvediView on AmazonThe odds are that if you don't figure in an administration's records, you won't figure in the historical record. But what do you do to get into those records? Raising a ruckus is one way. But that works only if someone else hasn't managed to raise more of a ruckus than you can ever hope to – and this, as Vinayak Chaturvedi tells us in Peasant Pasts: History and Memory in Western India (University of California Press, 2007) was exactly the situation the peasants of Gujarat faced during the last century of British rule in India. The Dharala peasants lived and worked in the Kheda district, the stomping ground of the powerful Patidar community, who formed a support base for Mahatma Gandhi's satyagraha campaigns. The Mahatma's nationalism did not, however, attract the Dharalas, given that the Patidars had co-opted it for themselves. The Dharalas felt they stood nothing to gain by joining forces with groups that locally exercised economic power over them. But that is not to say they didn't have their own ideas about the way they wished to live, as Chaturvedi shows. Peasant Pasts skillfully traces how the Dharalas, through many demonstrations employing traditional as well as more recent forms of protest, managed to form a distinct political identity of their own, one that is current and excites much debate in the region. And yes, they did manage to get themselves into the administrative records of the Indian state as well.

Howard SpodekView on AmazonAs Ahmedabad, the chief city of Gujarat state in Western India, puts itself up as a contender for World Heritage status, Howard Spodek's lovely book, Ahmedabad: Shock City of Twentieth Century India (Indiana University Press, 2011), can only give a boost to its campaign. This book is a discrete, yet integrated, collection of narratives from Ahmedabad throughout the twentieth century. The stories trace how this city quietly and unobtrusively sent out people and ideas into the rest of India, and on occasion acted out events that were reflective of trends across the wider Indian landscape. But, as Howard emphasizes, this is also a city that despite everything has remained staunchly and proudly Gujurati, its luminaries basing their power on resources and support from the surrounding regions. Mohandas Gandhi made this industrial city his base, as did many of his followers; the mills came and went, cultural and educational institutions sprang up, and Ahmedabad itself might yet undergo a change in moniker to Karnavati. None of this affects its mediaeval monuments, and patterns of life in its gated bylanes of pols, even as they retain characteristics from long ago, yet subtly, imperceptibly, shift and change in response to changing times.. Howard's book is a must read for an insight into century of the many that this many layered city has been in existence.