Summary: <p>Nathan has been struggling with two to incorporate ideas from economics into his understanding a fairness. How much should the consequences matter when deciding what is just? What are the appropriate property rights for individuals and for groups? How many cheap philosophical terms can Nathan and Mike throw in?</p> <h4>Connect with Not As Wrong</h4> <p><a href="http://notaswrong.com/" rel="nofollow">notaswrong.com</a><br> <a href="https://www.facebook.com/notaswrong/" rel="nofollow">Like Not As Wrong on Facebook</a><br> <a href="https://twitter.com/notaswrong" rel="nofollow">Follow @notaswrong on Twitter</a><br> <a href="https://www.patreon.com/notaswrong" rel="nofollow">Support Not As Wrong on Patreon</a></p><p>Links:</p><ul> <li><a title="The Nature of the Firm - Coase - 1937 - Economica - Wiley Online Library" rel="nofollow" href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x/full">The Nature of the Firm - Coase - 1937 - Economica - Wiley Online Library</a></li> <li><a title="The Problem of Social Cost - Ronald Coase (1960)" rel="nofollow" href="https://econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Courses/UCSBpf/readings/coase.pdf">The Problem of Social Cost - Ronald Coase (1960)</a></li> <li><a title="Dakota Access Pipeline - Wikipedia" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dakota_Access_Pipeline">Dakota Access Pipeline - Wikipedia</a></li> </ul>
