Summary: Episode 96 is a linkshow. James and Per discuss three articles they’ve stumbled upon whilst roaming the internet. First - Leisa Reichelt tweeted that she thought domain expertise was at times a hindrance. We discuss her in-depth follow-up blog post. Second - Micro-feedback. Seizing opportunities at specific points to collect little bits of feedback to aid your research efforts. Third - lets's get drunk and test web sites... for money! (Listening time: 35 minutes) https://soundcloud.com/uxpodcast/96-james-per-give-micro-feedback https://twitter.com/uxpodcast/status/583892393302302720 References: Article 1: <a href="http://www.disambiguity.com/when-experience-matters/">When experience matters (and when it doesn’t)</a> by <a href="http://twitter.com/leisa">Leisa Reichelt</a> Article 2: <a href="http://blog.invisionapp.com/get-better-qualitative-data-on-your-user-experience-with-microfeedback/">Get better qualitative data on your user experience with microfeedback</a> by <a href="https://twitter.com/sarahdoody">Sarah Doody</a> Article 3: <a href="http://theuserisdrunk.com/">The user is drunk</a> a service by <a href="https://twitter.com/richlitt">Richard Littauter</a> <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cMVKW-fR1M">Windows 8 operating under the influence</a> <a href="The%20User%20is%20Drunk%20%E2%80%93%20with%20Will%20Dayble">The user is drunk with Will Dayble</a> Featured image by <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/gforsythe/10173857405">Guilia Forsythe</a> (cropped to 1:1)
