The People's Countryside Environmental Debate Podcast

Why did the world witness such an overwhelming outpouring of emotion, following the death of Queen Elizabeth II? Whether or not you think that emotion was hyped and whipped up by the media, does this response indicate a broader yearning for stability, belonging, direction, and meaning in our lives? Is it possible that we seek something beyond ourselves to fill a void, bringing a sense of purpose? In this thought-provoking episode, your co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow delve deep into the heart of a matter raised via a question sent in by Maria in Catalonia, Spain. Maria's question is, "Did the outpouring of emotion shown after the death of Queen Elizabeth II indicate many of us are missing something from our lives, and in need of something outside of ourselves to bring stability, direction, and meaning?" During this episode Stuart and William embark on an exploration of human emotions,and our inherent need for something greater than ourselves. They delve into the universal human need for stability, and meaning, they then examine how society may sometimes seek external sources to anchor itself, amidst turbulent times. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠ or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

What are some concrete ways in which we can rethink the term "indigenous", to acknowledge the diversity and complexity of these cultures, rather than viewing them under a broad umbrella term? In what ways can we learn from indigenous peoples' deep connections to the natural world, applying their wisdom to create a more sustainable and harmonious relationship with our environment? In this thought-provoking episode, co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow delve into the intricate and critical issues surrounding the integration of indigenous people of the rainforests into the mainstream economy. The inspiration for this discussion comes from a profound question sent in by Kadonkechi from Minas Gerais, Brazil. Kadonkechi: “In Brazil the government states it wants to integrate the indigenous people of the rain forests into the mainstream economy, lifting millions out of poverty. That seems to assume these cultures are poor, don’t you think?  If we realised the potential of valuing the rain forest in new ways, it could also mean we all can become richer without destroying cultures. Billions of pounds worth of medicines, largely potentially undiscovered currently, can be surely found in the forests, why can't we explore and culture those, instead of clearing forests for short term cash crops or oil?  The rain forest could house the cure of the next pandemic or even Cancer. There's so much to be learnt from indigenous peoples. Millions of indigenous people lived in South America, then the Europeans colonised the coast 500 years ago, and viruses like flu and measles spread that killed up to 90% of the indigenous people.  Numbers are recovering but these people are at threat from deforestation and we need to learn from them before it's too late. I feel the next pandemic could come from Brazil if we keep encroaching on the forest as we are, allowing viruses to jump from wild animals to humans more easily.  Covid is thought to have come from bats and Pangelins, or from living too close to rain forests etc, and Measles is thought to have originated from cattle, so we really need to think about the future, whether or not you feel Covid escaped from a laboratory”.  During this episode Stuart and Wlliam tackle pressing questions such as whether we should put a monetary value on these ancient cultures, and what the real ambition of integrating indigenous cultures into ours is. Maybe we should really be thinking about how we should integrate ourselves into their culture too, it's a two way street after all..They question the pursuit of eternal growth in a society driven by profit margins, and discuss the importance of valuing aspects of life beyond the monetary system. Throughout the episode, they explore the potential for mutual learning and growth between cultures and ponder whether the term "indigenous" is an umbrella term that oversimplifies the vast diversity among these groups. So we ask you to think about whether it’s true that for us to learn from someone who is different from us culturally we have to accept them for being different in the first place. And if we don’t accept that, we don’t accept what they say. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends https://bit.ly/45vuCPP , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠ or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

Have you ever wondered why Sir David Attenborough's voice resonates so deeply with people of all ages? What makes him such a timeless figure, spanning across generations? How does he manage to strike the perfect balance between relatability and authority when discussing the natural world?  He's very relatable, but we don’t know that much about him as a person, and until we stop and think about that, many of us have never really appreciated that void in knowledge, which is an interesting thing to explore in itself. Some celebrities insist on knowing every little nuance of their character and life, yet we’re happy to not dig into what lies beneath Sir David's public profile. In this episode your co-hosts Stuart 'The Wildman' Mabbutt and William Mankelow dive into the enigmatic persona of Sir David Attenborough, a man who has captivated audiences for decades.  This was sparked by Mary from Gorse Hill, Swindon, Wiltshire, England, who sent in a thought-provoking question, asking, "Why do you think David Attenborough is so relevant across all generations?" During the episode Stuart and WIlliam discuss how Sir David’s genuine passion for the natural world shines through every word, making complex concepts approachable to everyone without ever sounding condescending. They'll also explore his relatable nature, despite having a posh accent, and how this quality has endeared him to viewers worldwide. They examine how Sir David Attenborough's on-screen presence and communication skills have allowed him to connect not just with individuals but entire families across different eras. His ability to bridge the gap between generations has turned his documentaries into shared experiences that can be enjoyed together. Every generation can relate as they’ve known him, which means a whole family can enjoy what he does.You get the impression that if you met him, he’d still be very relatable in person, and would be a good man to have a conversation with. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com During this episode Stuart and William talk about the fundraiser of £24,000 to help fund two wheelchairs enabling Stuart to continue bringing nature into the daily lives of others, sharing a lifetime of outdoor wisdom. You can donate today through the following link: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠ or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This is our 450th episode! We ask though, what does 450 episodes really mean? Does it in itself mean anything? Thanks for continuing to send in questions for us to discuss. We never planned to get to 450 episodes, our aim is always just the next episode. So, todays question comes from Mia, in Western Australia. “What’s your favourite piece of natural history footage?” Stuart and William, your co-hosts share their favourite natural history footage. Stuart’s is David Attenborough being sat on by a Gorilla. William’s remembers seeing footage of a particular bird which could mimic any sound it heard. The best natural history footage gives you an understanding of that creature’s environment, and where they live. Are we too squeamish about seeing animals kill and consume another? Isn’t this just the cycle of life? What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠ or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

Another listener question for your co-hosts Stuart and William to discuss, and todays is this one from Maria, Catalonia, Spain: “How do you think King Charles 3rd will evolve the UK monarchy? It's been said the monarchy will be slimmed down, what does that mean? The people are struggling in so many ways, how will the new King show the monarchy and royal family understand and can relate to the people, and how the people can relate to the monarchy? Or will it all be lip service to show and prove royalty still has a place in modern society, and effectively just a ruse by the system to save itself?” William thinks we should abolish the monarchy, do you agree with him? That said, Charles 3rd is clearly evolving the role in a masculine way obviously, but you can see that he can’t be as open as he used to be, due to the protocol of the position. So, how much can he really evolve the monarchy with these restrictions? Charles is finding it hard to bite his tongue, it isn’t the natural way, he’s used to speaking his mind. The monarchy has 100s of years of history behind it, so, even if the monarchy were slimmed down, they’d still be out there doing what they do. Further, how can the monarchy really understand and relate to people in the general public? How can we as people in the general public relate to the monarchy? How can you relate to someone above you and how can you relate to someone below you? The royal family are just another family, it’s just that they’re in the public, so does the royal family have a place in modern society? The royal family is motivated to stay relevant so we don’t revolt and get rid of them. Why do we follow each other and traditions like sheep? Isn’t life much more interesting when we don’t always follow traditions? What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠ or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

The WOW Effect, is effectively the effect we’ll have by getting Stuart ‘The Wildman’ a wheelchair, so he can keep working. Wildman On Wheels = The WOW Effect. Join us in this bonus episode, where Stuart and William discuss the fundraising campaign to help the former continue bringing nature into the daily lives of others. The goal is to raise £24,000 to fund two wheelchairs, which will enable Stuart to continue sharing a lifetime of outdoor wisdom and breaking down disability barriers.  A grant of £9k has already been secured from Access to Work, a government body that helps people get or stay in work if they have a physical or mental health condition or disability. However this won’t be paid out until both chairs are purchased in full. That generous 9k offer won’t be on the table indefinitely, so this Just Giving effort needs to gain good momentum and fast. The Access To Work 9k offer is on the table until November 2023, and though it can be extended, it can only be extended once. In this bonus episode you will hear about the different ways to donate, including one-time and monthly options, and how your support can make a real difference. Whether you’re an individual or a business, your support is invaluable. You can find out more about the funding campaign on the following page: https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

When we set out to make this podcast, our aim has always been just to focus on creating the next episode, nothing more complicated than that. Here we are 5 years later, carrying out that aim. During the life of this podcast we’ve seen changes in its content. from the early days of having invited guests meeting us face to face, to having honest, in-depth conversations, through the COVID pandemic lockdowns where we then turned to you, the listener, to send us in questions for Stuart and William to discuss. This podcast will continue to evolve naturally, it will never stay still, or get stale. Once again the questions that you’ve been sending inject a real freshness to each episode, as the themes vary widely from nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Will the podcast still be around in another five years? We’d like to think so. But our goal will always remain the same, to get the next episode of this podcast recorded, edited, and released. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠ or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

Do you think if somewhere like Australia became a republic that it would start the ball rolling, and other countries would go the same way? Is the UK a republic under the veil of a monarchy? What is the reticence of becoming a republic? Another interesting discussing arising from a listener question, this time Mia from Western Australia, here it is: “Now Queen Elizabeth 2nd has passed, do you think there will be a surge of countries moving towards becoming a republic, like New Zealand? They might stay part of the Commonwealth, and new applications may be made to join the Commonwealth, but will more countries still become a republic?” It’ll be interesting to see what happens after the ascension of King Charles III, though neither Stuart and William have really seen any news of New Zealand wanting to become a republic. An example of the above not happening though is Brexit, because so far no country has followed the lead of the UK. This could be down to other countries seeing the perceived effects on the UK of leaving the UK. There was a trust, and relationship with Queen Elizabeth II, but the new king gives those voices who want to break away from the commonwealth, an opportunity to get their voice heard. Stuart and William mention a Just Giving page in this episode, here’s the link https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/wildmanonwheels Without 'YOU' and your support we won't be able to continue to break down the disability barriers we face in providing our Wildman Environmental Learning service. We won't be able to continue to meaningfully take the benefits of being out in nature, and an awareness of the natural world around us, to wider audiences. This is particularly important at a time when we all know a connection with nature has benefits on multiple levels. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com⁠ We like to give you an ad free experience, so be assured, that will never happen. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers. This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠ or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

“If you could win an all-expenses paid trip anywhere in the world, where would it be, and how would you get there?” That is the question sent in by listener Jocelyne, from Grand Port District in Mauritius, and it fits in well with this podcast's overall themes of nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Where are the places you wouldn’t want to go to? Where are the places you would want to go?  Co-hosts Stuart and William suggest the greenest way currently is often the longest way, and that is something that needs looking at by society. Though on an all-expenses trip, the method of travel, and route, is often baked in with little flex for the itinerary to be changed to be made more sustainable. They go on to say they themselves feel travel can very much be part of a holiday as well, and Stuart feels has been everywhere he’s wanted to go. So if won this trip being discussed, he’d give it to someone that he feels would benefit from the adventure more than him. On the other hand, if William won it, he feels he’d go to Hamburg, but insist on taking slower methods of transit. So train, ferry etc. Making the whole thing as sustainable as he could. This particular episode was again edited by Lukas Seifert, an Oxford University Micro intern, who worked alongside Stuart and William for a week on a variety of creative tasks, including the edit of this episode. We’d like to thank Lukas for his work, notably the high standard he brought to the role, great communication skills, and also the extra energy and impetus he gave us. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com⁠, or record us a message in your own voice by going to ⁠https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message⁠Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠ or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

In another captivating episode, hosts Stuart and William delve into the enchanting world of the seasons, and their profound impact on our lives. Even if we don’t notice. Join them as they explore this simple, yet deep question that listener Manon from Pays de la Loire, France, poses: “Which is your favourite season and why?” During this episode Stuart and William contemplate the cyclical nature of time, and challenge our perceptions of the changing seasons. Can we truly imagine the transition from winter to summer, or vice versa, when immersed in one season's embrace? And with climate patterns shifting, is the traditional concept of seasons evolving before our eyes? It’s always worth reminding ourselves that the environment isn’t just ‘out there’ somewhere, it’s all around us at any given moment in time. Enjoy the season you’re in, as each has its own value and merits.  Every season has its own feeling.  What are the three words that reflect each season to you? This particular episode was edited by Lukas Seifert, an Oxford University Micro intern, who worked alongside Stuart and William for a week on a variety of creative tasks, including the edit of this episode. We’d like to thank Lukas for his work, notably the high standard he brought to the role, great communication skills, and also the extra energy and impetus he gave us. Lukas edited the next episode too, so check it out when its released, and see if his differing editing style brings a different vibe.  What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com⁠, or record us a message in your own voice by going to ⁠https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message⁠ This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠ or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

Are some people really content living their lives without aspirations and dreams? Does the absence of these goals devalue their existence? Stuart and William, the hosts of this well established podcast, delve into the realm of ambitions and dreams, spurred on by the captivating question below, which was sent in by listener, Peter from Ostergotland, Sweden: “What’s the point of a life without dreams and ambition?” Together, Stuart and William navigate the winding paths of life's purpose. Discussing how dreams and ambitions can both enrich and restrict our experiences. Join them on this nomadic journey of introspection, as they explore whether having aspirations truly imbues a life with meaning, or if it's merely a passing pursuit. Life, after all, is a constantly evolving tapestry, of unexpected twists and turns. Your hosts remind us that there's no need to feel guilty or inadequate for not having dreams and ambition, and that we can also find solace in embracing the ebb and flow of life, away from those kinds of distractions, as dreams can be restrictive at times too. Though it's true, some people need ambitions to drive them, it's also worth remembering, all any of us are really doing is, passing time. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com⁠, or record us a message in your own voice by going to ⁠https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message⁠ This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠ or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

Considering the debate surrounding the timing of protests, should certain occasions, such as periods of mourning, be considered off-limits for demonstrations, or can they still serve as powerful platforms for expressing dissent? Stuart and William once again explore and chew over another great listener question, which was this time sent in by Molly from Oxford, England. Molly’s question was long and detailed, so would have exceeded the character limit in this description, so instead of including it here verbatim, we’ve copied it onto a Google doc, using the following link: Link to Molly’s full question The crux of Molly’s question is “Please explore the right to protest, and right to grieve?” During this episode Stuart and William explore the notion of self-censorship, and the complexities surrounding freedom of speech. Stuart and William feel freedom of speech isn’t always the right to say what you want, when you want. They discuss whether protests should be separated from certain occasions, and whether the timing of a protest affects its effectiveness, positively and negatively.  Further exploring the question of whether a protest at the coronation would be better timed than during a period of mourning, like at Queen Elizabeth the 2nd’s funeral?  Regardless of whether the media whipped people up into phantom sadness, with all the wall to wall mass coverage of her funeral, should the timings of the protests that happened there have been considered better? The protestors at this very public event were trying to get their message across and heard, but if timed badly, that message could have been lost. If any protest happens at the wrong point, it increases the chance of a higher percentage of negative feedback, and less time or opportunity for dialogue. There’s never a good time to protest, but shouldn’t we be highlighting some issues and having some conversations away from these kind of occasions? What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com⁠, or record us a message in your own voice by going to ⁠https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message⁠ This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠ or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

How has the word "passionate" become overused and diluted in our everyday language, and what alternative ways can we use to express genuine enthusiasm and curiosity? What are the consequences of constantly labelling people, events, and things as “passionate” or “iconic," and how has this led to the loss of the true essence of these words? Join William and Stuart as they engage in another captivating conversation, this time sparked by listener Justin's question from Nova Scotia, Canada. Their question is as follows: “What are you both passionate about?” During the episode William contemplates his own interests, and concludes that perhaps he is simply genuinely intrigued by them, rather than being truly passionate. Meanwhile, Stuart, driven by a deep aversion to the word and a fervent desire to refine language, passionately advocates for the removal of the word "passionate" from the everyday English lexicon. Throughout the episode, Stuart and William Stuart contemplate the nature of passion itself, examining whether it is merely an emotion, that can blind individuals from perceiving reality, objectively. They pose questions about the importance of seeking balance in life, and challenge listeners to reconsider the role of measured expression, in a world saturated and impregnated with hyperbole.  During this episode they also mention the talks they do together, and in particular mention the Speakernet link which lists the six talks they do together that you can book them for. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com⁠, or record us a message in your own voice by going to ⁠https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message⁠ This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠ or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

TRIGGER WARNING!!! If you’re listening to this episode with your children, cover their ears! There’s a lot of swearing! We’ve not edited it out as the feeling behind the delivery, this time, really reinforces the point being made, and brings to life the story behind told. This podcast's overall essence and themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.  Today's listener question comes from Colin in Saarland, Germany. It's short and concise, but enough meat on the bone for Stuart and William, your co-hosts, to survive on. Here it is: “Who or what has let you down or disappointed you in recent times?” They explore if a person actually lets us down, or is it our expectations of them haven’t been met? To be let down we need to have an expectation in the first place, is that always the case though? Stuart and William are very honest with who they feel have let them down, and explore what that really means. A very personal episode for them both. Who do you feel has let you down? Did they really let you down or did you have unrealistic or improbable expectations? What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com⁠, or record us a message in your own voice by going to ⁠https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message⁠Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠ or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message

This was a genocide. It took a lot of courage for the Pope to come out with the word genocide. It’s a powerful statement, but now we need progression. We need to build a pathway forward.  Does the fact the Pope has come out mean that what happened can no longer be denied though? A way forward too is to keep talking about it, keep exploring the harsh truths, to be open about what happened. The problem won’t go away, it is part of all our histories.  Bruce, who listens from Tampa, Florida, USA, certainly opens a can of worms with this question he’s sent in for discussion: “Have you explored on the podcast that the Pope has said the treatment of Indigenous First Nation children, by the Catholic Church, amounts to genocide?” In the last century, a lot of children were forcibly taken from indigenous first nation indian cultures in the US, and settled with white, English speaking families, or put in homes run by the Catholic church. Seemingly with the aim of diluting the influence and power of the first nation cultures.  Many of the children's remains are now being discovered inside and outside these homes, so this can certainly be considered genocide. Genocide is a very powerful statement. There are good people in history though, and there are bad people. There’s some good history, there’s some bad history. It’s easy to have vitriol against something, and you can turn yourself inside out and into a rabid dog about such things, but does that anger truly solve the issues fully? Speak to the person in front of you, see them as a human being, and see where the conversation goes. No issue in history has ever failed to ultimately be resolved by people coming together and discussing the harsh truths. That's what's needed here, well that's what your co-hosts feel. Some of the most celebrated American celebrities are deeply rooted indigenous cultures, so let's keep talking and valuing those different to us. What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com⁠, or record us a message in your own voice by going to ⁠https://anchor.fm/thepeoplescountryside/message⁠ This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice. Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends ⁠https://podfollow.com/the-peoples-countryside-environmental-debate-podcast/view⁠ , support our work through Patreon ⁠https://www.patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠ or just 'follow' to avoid missing any public posts. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thepeoplescountryside/message