IJ's FreedomCast show

IJ's FreedomCast

Summary: The Institute for Justice records regular podcasts featuring interviews with both IJ clients and attorneys. We discuss the principles we fight for as we advance a rule of law under which individuals can control their destinies as free and responsible members of society. Listen to more podcasts or Subscribe to the IJ FreedomCast via iTunes. Receive IJ's videos by subcribing to IJ FreedomFlix via iTunes.

Join Now to Subscribe to this Podcast
  • Visit Website
  • RSS
  • Artist: The Institute for Justice
  • Copyright: Copyright (c) 2009, The Institute for Justice

Podcasts:

 Campaign Finance Laws Restrict Free Speech | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 34:36

The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution says “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech,” but campaign-finance laws actually restrict the right of citizens to speak out.  IJ attorneys Steve Simpson and Paul Sherman are campaign-finance experts who litigate free speech cases across the country.  In this podcast, they give a brief history of campaign finance laws, Citizens United and Speechnow.org.   Guests: IJ Attorneys Steve Simpson and Paul ShermanHost: Shira RawlinsonLength:34:36Date: February 2012

 The Rights Not Listed in the U.S. Constitution | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 24:05

The Framers drafted the Bill of Rights to protect individual liberty from government encroachment.  Although the Framers listed specific rights in the first eight amendments of the U.S. Constitution, the 9th Amendment makes clear that these “enumerated” rights are not a complete list of all rights the Constitution protects. Following the Civil War, another rights-protecting provision, the Privileges or Immunities Clause, was added to the Constitution as part of the 14th Amendment. The 9th Amendment and the Privileges or Immunities Clause both protect liberties such as the right to earn an honest living. These so-called “unenumerated” rights are every bit as much a part of the Constitution as specifically enumerated rights, and Institute for Justice Attorneys Clark Neily and Robert McNamara discuss why the rights not listed in the Constitution must be protected by the courts.   Guests: IJ Attorneys Clark Neily and Robert McNamaraHost: Shira RawlinsonLength: 24:05Date: January 2012

 Government Unchecked: The False Problem of “Judicial Activism” and the Need for Judicial Engagement | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 29:02

IJ Senior Attorneys Clark Neily and Steve Simpson discuss the new Center for Judicial Engagement report called Government Unchecked: The False Problem of “Judicial Activism” and the Need for Judicial Engagement. They answer the questions: Is the U.S. Supreme Court running roughshod over the other branches of government?  Is it true, as outgoing Sen. Arlen Specter claimed, that the Court “has been eating Congress’s lunch by invalidating legislation with judicial activism”?  According the report, the answer is emphatically no.   Guests: IJ Attorneys Clark Neily and Steve SimpsonHost: Shira RawlinsonLength: 29:02Date: October 2011

 Make-Believe Judging: The Rational Basis Test Exposed | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 29:59

IJ Senior Attorneys Clark Neily and Jeff Rowes discuss the rational basis test and how it is used by courts in constitutional cases to provide the appearance of judicial review without the substance. Guests: IJ Attorneys Clark Neily and Jeff RowesHost: Shira RawlinsonLength: 29:59Date: Jul 2011

 The Attorney Cartel: How Attorney Licensing Suppresses Competition | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 16:31

IJ Staff Attorney Anthony Sanders talks about attorney licensing and how states use licensing to protect established attorneys from competition.  IJ recently had a victory for attorneys in Minnesota’s legal market.  Click here to learn more. Guest: IJ Staff Attorney Anthony SandersHost: Mark MerantaLength: 16:31Date:  June 2011

 Half-baked: Critiquing the Lochner Critics | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 36:18

IJ attorneys Clark Neily and Robert McNamara discuss one of the Supreme Court's most misunderstood—and mischaracterized—cases, Lochner v. New York (1905), in which the Court struck down a state law limiting the number of hours bakers could work.  Neily and McNamara argue that it is much easier to caricature the Lochner decision than to criticize it persuasively.  Neily and McNamara also explain how the majority's decision is more faithful to the text, history, and purpose of the Constitution than the dissents, particularly Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes's full-throated embrace of judicial abdication and statism. Guests: IJ Attorneys Clark Neily and Robert McNamaraHost: Shira RawlinsonLength: 36:18Date: May 2011

 Economic Liberty in the Constitution | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 21:54

IJ Senior Attorney Clark Neily explains how and why economic liberty is protected by the Constitution. Guest: IJ Senior Attorney Clark NeilyHost: Shira RawlinsonLength: 21:54Date: March 2011

 Eminent Domain and Blight Reform in Washington State and Beyond | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 11:27

IJ Staff Attorney Jeanette Petersen discusses eminent domain abuse and blight reform in the United States, focusing especially on progress in Washington State. Guest: IJ Staff Attorney Jeanette Petersen Host: Mark Meranta Length: 11:27Date: October 2010

 The Interior Design Cartel in Washington State | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 11:41

IJ Senior Attorney Michael Bindas talks about the interior design cartel in Washington State, and the ways industry insiders try to use the law to keep out competition.  Guest: IJ Senior Attorney Michael Bindas Host: Mark Meranta Length: 11:41Date: October 2010

 Supreme Court Update for Arizona Clean Elections | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 06:45

IJ's Bill Maurer talks about the news that the Institute's Arizona Clean Elections case will go before the U.S. Supreme Court in 2011.  Guest:  Executive Director of the Institute for Justice Washington Chapter Bill MaurerHost: Mark MerantaLength: 06:45Date:  August 2010

 McDonald v. Chicago | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 14:20

Listen to expert commentary about the June 28, 2010 SCOTUS ruling in McDonald v. Chicago. Guest:  IJ Staff Attorney Robert McNamara Host: Mark Meranta Length: 14:20Date:  October 2010

 IJ Client Mercedes Clemens | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 3:47

Institute for Justice client Mercedes Clemens talks about her fight to practice massage.

Comments

Login or signup comment.