Freedomain! Volume 5: Shows 1560-2119 - Freedomain Radio
Summary: Powerful ideas for all lovers of personal and political freedom - Freedomain Radio is the largest and most popular philosophy show on the web, and was a Top 10 Finalist in the 2007, 2008 and 2009 Podcast Awards. Topics range from politics to philosophy to science to economics to relationships to atheism - and how to achieve real freedom in your life today. Passionate, articulate, funny and irreverent, Freedomain Radio shines a bold light on old topics, and invents a few new ones to boot!
- Visit Website
- RSS
- Artist: Stefan Molyneux
- Copyright: Stefan Molyneux
Podcasts:
Dr. Omaha, an innovator in the field of emotion regulation, created Affect Centered Therapy. He has trained hundreds of therapists in ACT and AMST throughout the United States, in Australia, and in Europe. Dr. Omaha conducts outcome research on ACT and AMST through the Institute for Affect Centered Therapy, a non-profit he established in Chico, in northern California.
Some great feedback from FDR1621...
It's really about asking questions to see if people can actually think...
Differences between men and woman, and how to survive crappy jobs and build a real career.
Some additional thoughts about the previous podcast.
Some thoughts about a video I will be working on shortly.
An interesting conversation with a listener about religion and the existence of God.
Stephan Kinsella is an American intellectual property lawyer and libertarian legal theorist. His electronically-published works are primarily published on his blog and websites associated with the Ludwig von Mises Institute and anarcho-capitalist organizations. This is a Freedomain Radio book club discussion of one of Stephan's most popular books: 'Against Intellectual Property'
An application of the theory to the challenges of religion and Marxism.
Some citations of the source data for the previous two podcasts.
A family and religious analysis of sibling abuse.
A family and political analysis of sibling abuse.
How much power does Paul Krugman think the government needs to solve the health care crisis?
Rational ways to counter the argument that a democratic government reflects the will of the people.
Should we expect our elders to live by the values that they inflicted upon us?
