Saturday’s NY Times Television story, You’ve Seen the YouTube Video; Now Try the Documentary, describes a viral video’s journey from YouTube to National Geographic Channel.  It’s an extraordinary video of a herd of buffalo fighting off a pride of lions and a croc to save one of its calves, and the video’s adventure is almost as fascinating as the battle footage, with its viral popularity and National Geographic’s interest triggered by an incidental upload to YouTube because it was cheaper and easier than burning a DVD and mailing via USPS.

Battle at Kruger - YouTube Video

The New York Times story speaks to the growing power and influence of the internet and YouTube relative to broadcast television.  But there’s also a meta-story that reinforces the challenge that traditional media companies face as they come to terms with the internet.

The print world has been forced to open up its content to the online world.  Readers who want online news content will find it, and the print ad revenue those readers used to bring with them is being replaced by smaller online ad revenues.  The only choice for newspapers has been to keep at least the online ad revenue by opening up their content and maximizing monetization, or to let their competitors take all the revenue from them.

So nytimes.com, the only way I read that paper, carries the full story online, accompanied by beautiful hires images and an unfortunately no longer functioning link to the original YouTube post.  Someone in nytimes.com’s ad sales department did a great job too, as the article is surrounded by banner ads for the National Geographic Channel episode.  Or also likely, the article and the advertising were planned together - in a world where content is free, content and advertising are increasingly one and the same. Either way, there is no doubt that those well-targeted ads are maximizing the revenue potential for this particular story.

Click on any of those banner ads and you’ll get a stark reminder that television and print are still in very different worlds.

The National Geographic Channel has a well-constructed mini-site for Caught on Safari: Battle at Kruger, featuring the next prime time airing and accompanied by a video short/promo, the full YouTube clip, photos, information about Kruger, and related stories.  But you won’t find the the hourlong episode online.  The “real” content can only be accessed through your cable or satellite feed, where Newscorp and National Geographic, who jointly run National Geographic Channel, ring the cash register.

Print, and more profoundly, music, were the first media for which the internet could deliver a competitive and over time superior audience experience at a lower distribution cost.  As described above, the only response available to most outlets has been to cannibalize themselves or be killed.  No surprise that shares in The New York Times Company (NYT), at $19.67, are down 57% over a five year period; other major papers are in the same boat.

The internet does not yet deliver a super audience experience at a lower distribution cost compared to television.  Not yet.  Most streaming, YouTube in particular, is nowhere near standard broadcast quality, let alone HD, but there are an increasing number of exceptions.  It’s still pretty expensive to stream high quality video.  Getting internet video into the living room is costly, kludgy and not ready for the mass market, but then again, I also prefer reading a physical newspaper over breakfast than catching up on the news with my laptop.

So the networks have benefited from the luxury of time and insight from print and music as they experiment with online content and monetization.  They can still keep their highest value content available through broadcast only, where most of the money is, and use online as a tool for promotion and viewer engagement, selectively releasing episodes where doing so reinforces that dynamic.  Investors aren’t betting against the networks; shares in News Corp. (NWS), at $19.35, are up 33% over their price five years ago.

In the meantime, internet video is beginning to breach the walls of the living room, and the quality / cost tradeoff of internet video distribution continues to progress along the path suggested by Moore’s law.  The networks have some more time to work out how to maximize online monetization, but they don’t have forever.  And while they have a big leg up on the newspapers and music labels in this game, it’s sobering to bear in mind that investors weren’t betting against those players either five years ago.

You’ve seen the scantily clad cocktail waitresses in the casinos.  The sexy woman posed on the hood of a car.  We know that sex gets men’s attention.

But does sex actually sell?

A new research study by Brian Knutson of Stanford suggests the answer is yes; at least, that heterosexual men are more likely to take financial risks after being subjected to positive emotional stimuli—in the case of the study, erotic photos of a man and woman.

Why should digital marketers and publishers care?

As digital content and advertising become increasingly intertwined (here’s one of many posts on that topic), and marketers and publishers get better about measuring the effectiveness of their efforts (read more in our mini-eBook on social media performance management), we can expect the trend toward sex in advertising to be further invigorated (pun intended), at least in advertising that targets men.

And as social media becomes an increasingly effective marketing tool, we can also expect more of the digital equivalent of those cocktail waitresses.  The Stanford study alluded to the particular relevance in online gaming (gambling) businesses, and I noticed the effect firsthand when checking out XuQa.com, an online casual gaming community co-founded by Murtaza Hussain, co-founder and CEO of PeanutLabs and the subject of a recent DigitalPodcast interview.  Many of the most popular gaming rooms in XuQa are hosted by very attractive women (or at least hosts with photos of very attractive women), and the formula seems to be quite successful there.

By the way, for our female readers (my wife included) who by now are gloating over the superiority of your half of the species, beware:  Mr. Knutson is planning to test women’s responses in the future.

Andrew and Alex joined Forrester for its 2008 Marketing Forum, which focused on the challenge of customer engagement in a digital media world.  This second series of articles focuses on case studies of companies using interactive applications as the hook for building communities of superfans.

Creating Brand Advocates at Nike’s Jordan Brand
Emmanuel Brown, Director of Digital and Content, Nike’s Jordan Brand

Nike’s Jordan Brand has developed a couple of immersive experiences for highly engaged fans.  The experiences start with deep insight into these “superfan” needs, and build intense community engagement for these hardcore fans, but are small scale communities relative to the scope of the Jordan Brand.  Which raises the question, are these high ROI applications for engaging and activating superfans, or are they so focused on the hard core that they are failing to engage the brand’s mass market?  Read on and share your opinion…

Emmanuel began by sharing background on Nike, whose headquarters in Beaverton, Oregon is like a Disneyland for adults, and its Jordan Brand division, where Michael Jordan (MJ) still deeply interacts with the brand, the same way that he was engaged with the game of basketball.

Mentally, or digitally, cut to a stirring, inspiring Michael Jordan video (videos can be found at Nike’s site for the Jordan Brand, Jumpman23).

The Jordan Brand.  Nike approached Michael Jordan in 1984 to have a signature shoe built around him, a completely novel concept at the time.  In 1996, the Jordan Brand was born as a division within Nike.  The brand has 110 people versus the Tiger Woods Brand’s 400 people, and both brands support the same amount of revenue.  Nine out of ten people own (or have owned) Air Jordans, and the Jordan Brand is the second in the market behind Nike itself.

The Jordan Brand’s primary consumer is the core urban male 15-20 year old, highly competitive, a leader of the team.  These guys often know what the brand is doing before the news is made public.  The secondary consumer is 12-24 year old males and females, urban and suburban, not necessarily competitive.  Their consumers’ mind space includes social media, television, and the video game space.  The Jordan Brand does a lot of marketing through video games – with them, kids can see the entire line-up.  Most kids know what products they want before they get to the store.

The engagement philosophy for the brand is (1) to engage with consumers where and when they want (online!); (2) product and service together are critical to delivering a greater experience and engagement; and finally (3) the consumer decides.

The Jordan Breakfast Club.  A key platform for engagement is the Jordan Breakfast Club.  The challenge was to establish an authentic position for Jordan in the training marketplace.  Every morning, MJ and his teammates used to wake up and complete a workout regiment before he got to eat his four course breakfast.  So the Jordan Brand went after an unmet need of the target customer around training – everyone says that training is important, but no one tells kids how to train.  The Breakfast Club includes a simple peer-based assessment and a custom designed workout program that can be printed out or downloaded onto an iPod as videos for a huge number of possible workouts.  The Jordan Breakfast Club has 20,000 plus engaged users, and tens of thousands additional views on YouTube.  The Club also did a 10-city summer tour to reach thousands more at day long training camps.  The program won a 2007 Forrester Groundswell Award.

The Jordan Flight Club.  After building the Breakfast Club, the brand started getting more information about its consumers, and next started the Flight Club.  The Jordan brand has a huge “sneaker-head” following, and the Flight Club is about limited edition, one-at-a-time, high demand products for fiercely loyal customers who are willing to pay a very high price and avoid the disappointment of trying to get limited products through retail.  The brand got a lot of feedback from consumers in designing how the Breakfast Club would work.  Members of jumpman23.com got membership offers and the opportunity to invite two more friends – in others words, an “insider” offer for loyal customers only.  Demand went through the roof, with people selling their free invitations on eBay, and over 40,000 members joining in the first 45 days.

Emmanuel’s summary:  (1) create relevant experiences beyond the product, (2) service complementary needs of the consumer, (3) empower engaged consumers to be brand advocates, and (3) create and own communities where they are relevant and authentic.  The Jordan Brand’s next big challenge is to take these opportunities in the digital space and migrate them to the physical space, like the Jordan Breakfast Club tour.

Q&A Discussion

How do you share learning from the Jordan Brand throughout Nike?  We do case studies.  Things may work differently for us versus golf, and we use best practices.

The 15-20 year old market is refreshed every 5 years, so how do you target for the future, and specifically do you market to even younger (under 15) generations?  We try to communicate in a simplified format, keep MJ’s story relevant, and make great products.  We don’t market to the younger kids, but do try to emphasize success through working hard.

What do you mean that you’ve learned the hard way about ignoring customers?  We created a website where consumers could buy one-off products, and only created 6,000 units of a product that 1.6 million consumers tried to buy, crashing the site and generating hate mail.  We use sales data and forecasting to ensure that problem is not repeated going forward.  We’d rather overstock and deal with excess inventory than to have too little product and anger consumers.

For limited editions, doesn’t it help the brand to sell out so fast?  You have to appreciate the global effect of our brand.  Kids in Australia were getting their hands on US-only products; we responded to make the products available there.   We’re pushing to think more globally and satisfy demand, offering limited products in all parts of the world.

The Breakfast Club concept sounds great, but how are you measuring the true impact?  We’re not measuring the financials, but we do track the ongoing activities of the kids who sign up.  One of the Pro teams we visited adopted the philosophy as their primary means of training!

Andrew and Alex joined Forrester Research for its 2008 Marketing Forum. This article is the second in our series from the forum focused on customer engagement in a digital media world.

Realizing Your Return on Empathy (ROE)

Steve Kerho, VP Analytics, Organic
Mark Kingdon, CEO, Organic
Creating effective online (and offline) marketing solutions starts with a deep, emotional understanding of your customer segments and their needs - in other words, “empathy” for your customer “personas”. This empathy serves as a critical guide in designing online and other touchpoints, and the personas also support breaking down how you measure and respond to online performance.

Mark led off the sessions with the observation that as marketers, we have a lot of data about customers, but we need to get beyond the data to “touch” our customers.

He then solicited audience feedback on the importance of understanding customers in marketing through a uniquely engaging technique. When we sat down in the conference room, a pad and a branded pen were keeping each of our seats warm. The pens were laser pointers, and Mark gave us a brief tutorial on turning them on and aiming them without blinding our neighbors.

Mark walked us through a series of slides filled with questions and multiple choice “answer” targets; the volume of laser points bouncing around each target quickly illuminated audience response. The survey responses told us that collectively, we thought it important to find an edge in our marketing and to develop and understand customer personas to refine marketing approaches, but that we had a way to go in implementing these techniques.

Organic believes that getting to personas is so fundamental to their work that each year they send staff down to Vegas for “persona work”. The group breaks down into seven teams that are each assigned one of seven sins. Each team is tasked with observing people indulging in their target sin, and then developing a campaign for that persona. The exercise is all about getting to empathy, getting everyone on the same song sheet around what’s driving the consumer, their behavior and their needs.

Organic sees four steps in order to take advantage of empathy:

(1) Know your consumers well enough to develop detailed personas,
(2) Design web experiences around those personas,
(3) Tailor all media and touchpoints to these personas, and
(4) Know and optimize against “Return on Empathy”.

To get to step 4, marketing needs to secure management commitment to overcoming the challenges of siloed organizations, to develop a process for optimizing efforts, and to connect campaign objectives to metrics.

Why go through all this effort? Because empathy pays off, as Steve demonstrated with three case studies:

Jeep Patriot. The business objectives were to create familiarity and purchase intent for this all new vehicle in a crowded segment, targeting younger, internet saavy buyers. The solution was a very interactive online experience, where they shot 40 or so minute-long video segments for about the cost of a traditional 30 second spot. These segments comprise an interactive film, which viewers could enter and then steer their experience and outcome. Consumers were introduced to the story starting with a TV broadcast spot, then rich online ads, targeted emails, and theatrical trailers. In total their was about an hour of content, and the vehicle and its features appear in every scene. Their campaign had great results – Jeep more than doubled its target for unique visitors, with 80% of them new to the Jeep brand, enjoying an average viewing time of 5 minutes with 40% of visitors staying for over 10 minutes.

Bank of America’s No Fee Mortgage Plus product. The business objectives were to create familiarity, awareness and sell-through. They identified one persona familiar with the mortgage process, and another unfamiliar with it, and customized the site experience accordingly after three very simple multiple choice pre-qualifying questions.

Coach. The business objective was to increase the sales of bags online. The empathy process highlighted a key “persona” issue around women’s discomfort buying bags unless they are sure that they fit. The solution was to create an online bag “sizer” that drove a substantial increase in sales and reduction in returns.

After the case studies, Steve walked us through an example of metrics supporting “ROE” on site design. The example showed how the measures were built up, and demonstrated the differential impact on return against identified personas versus non-personas.

The session was running late so there wasn’t much time to discuss the ROI calculations, below.  Deeper reflection reveals a number of interesting questions, for example, why calculate ROI based on revenue rather than contribution margin, why only amortize the redesign over one quarter, and whether the redesign impacted other drivers of value such as new customer acquisition and retention rates.  You might choose a different set of assumptions for your business, but in any case, the persona-level analysis of differential site performance provides an important basis for objectively evaluating ROI.

The bottom line: executed well, empathy pays.

Q&A Discussion

You mentioned that the Jeep example exceeded traffic goals, but how does one go about establishing those goals? You end up in the forecasting business, and need to use historical performance offline and online as the baseline that you are trying to meet or exceed, for example CPM through traditional media (even though may be lower engagement, more eyeballs) You can also look at search traffic and value as another baseline for the value of the consumers you bring in.

How difficult is it to sell-in the work of building personas to clients? Actually, doing so in increasingly easy, and we have had some clients asking only for personas, not the follow-on work.

What is the role of customers in participating in site design? Customers are an increasingly important part of the process. In fact, we are working with a client now to involve customers in their core product development process.

How are you developing personas beyond traditional observations? We have deliberately selected low-tech workshops versus high tech means to develop personas, which surprises many because so much of what we do is high tech. That approach may evolve over time.

Does all this work to actually increase sales? Our clients have realized a high correlation between engagement, purchase intent, and buying behavior.

Digital Podcast joined Forrester for its 2008 Marketing Forum, which focused heavily on the challenge of customer engagement in a digital media world. We’ll be writing about the conference over the next two weeks. Our first series of articles, like the conference, is focused on the topic of engagement. This article covers the first two presentations of the conference.

Setting the Stage
Harley Manning, Vice President, Research Director, Forrester

Harley introduces the conference’s theme by emphasizing that the imperative for marketing success going forward is customer engagement, and previews three case studies on the subject.

Traditional channels are shrinking – the 30 second spot is declining in reach and importance – yet the new channels, like YouTube, hold risk for marketers. The challenge and opportunity is to engage with customers and in return they’ll engage with your brand.

Harley shared three quick case studies of engagement:

Jordan’s Furniture: Is it a furniture store or an amusement park? Complete with a trapeze school, water display, café, IMAX theatre, and the backing of Berkshire Hathaway, Jordan’s engaged customers stroll past “finished room” furniture displays to get to lots of the good stuff. Along the way, they seem to buy a lot of furniture

Nike Running website: Articles, splashy photos, and aspirational content motivated Harley to drop a wad of cash on Nike’s best running shoes, begin running again after a lengthy hiatus, and then drop more cash on Nike apparel. Is Harley buying shoes or buying into a lifestyle?

LeapFrog: Toys that engage Harley’s son’s brain while he’s too busy having fun to notice that he is learning too. No wonder these toys sell like hotcakes.

Engagement: A New Approach To Understanding Your Customers
Brian Haven, Senior Analyst, Forrester

Two brands, two superfans, two very different reactions – one shove, and one embrace. If you want your fans to keep loving your brand, try hugging them back!

The Ikea Superfan

Brian starts by sharing a story of true engagement, and how gazing into the eyes of superfan love be hard for some corporations. Jen is an Ikea superfan from Ohio, and she singlehandedly started a movement to bring Ikea to her corner of Ohio. She started a website, scouted retail locations, and worked tirelessly to drum up support for Ikea to move in. How did Ikea management react? They warned her to stop using their trademark, were concerned when her Google rank approached that of the brand, and after actually building a store in her neck of the woods, Ikea didn’t even respond to her job application. While Ikea is a great brand that does many things right, they could have handled this superfan in a more enlightened manner.

What can we learn from Jen’s story? The traditional marketing funnel and message control is a thing of the past. Consumers can now chase down a spaghetti maze of paths to your brand, and marketers risk drowning in a sea of metrics – too often we don’t know which matter, what to do with them, and even if we did, how to track them technologically and across channels.

Even overcoming all these hurdles, the next challenge is how to make “engagement” actionable. What does engagement mean?

In simple terms, engagement is a person’s participation with a brand, regardless of channel, where they call the shots. Brian defines engagement as the 4 I’s, the level of Involvement, Interaction, Intimacy and Influence that a person has with a brand over time:

• Involvement: A person’s presence at brand touchpoints
• Interactions: A person’s actions while at the touchpoints
• Intimacy: A person’s affection for a brand
• Influence: A person’s advocacy for a brand

The Alli Superfan

Brian shares a contrasting example – Laura, who tries out GlaxoSmithKline’s “alli” weight loss system and community website. The system and site effectively engage Laura:

• Involvement through community tracking, forum tracking, registration data
• Interaction through product purchases, diet diaries, fridge photos, food journals
• Intimacy through product feedback, online ad opinions and shopping experience
• Influence through tools for advocacy.

As Laura worked with the system and the website (and lost a lot of weight!), GlaxoSmithKline decided to feature Laura, one of their most engaged customers, on the web site. This highly engaging system realized a very successful launch – in just the first six weeks, 1 million people tried product, and they rang up $155 million in sales on a $150 million ad budget.

Brian then discussed some of the steps for defining and measuring engagement (understand existing and outside data and metrics) and encouraging engagement (provide content, facilitate conversations, give customers a reason for sharing information). Engagement involves a fundamentally different relationship with customers.

And he reminded marketers to engage, embrace, and encourage the Jen’s of the world.

Q & A Discussion with Brian

How to address the fact that companies have many different departments involved in “engagement” and many different metrics are used? The marketing team needs to take lead with other parts of the company to share the vision of engagement, provide value to those groups, and bring the company together on goals and associated metrics.

How to identify and scale Superfans like Jen? Online is a great place to start. There are brand monitoring services, even Google search can be used to find the bloggers. To scale this group, first nail the customer insight, who the customers are, what they care about. Then the best way to attract, encourage and track them will depend on the answer to those questions.

How can companies engage around intangible, infrequent purchases such as insurance or other financial services? The purchase may be infrequent, but there is ongoing usage data that you can track and monitor. These customers may not be engaged Superfans like Jen, but the same principles apply.

How should Ikea have treated Jen? Not to pick on Ikea, but Jen wasn’t doing anything bad, everything she communicated about Ikea was positive. Ikea should have leaked her information about the store in advance, given her access to better technology to support the blog, talked about her on their own website. Reach out, embrace, and help your superfans! Very simple things would have meant the world to Jen, and would encourage others like her.

Are there examples where pursuing engagement has backfired? There is nothing negative about understanding who your customers are and what they care about. Overall there are negative things that can happen, but remember we’re in a different world now, and we don’t have the same control. We have to stop being scared of our customers.

What do you do about people who are negatively engaged with the brand? We call this disengagement, and it will happen whether you like it or not. The question is do you want it to happen where you can see and influence it, or spread out beyond your reach. Ultimately, brands need to pay attention to the reasons for disengagement and make their products better!

This panel at the Future of Television conference focused on the state of Mobile TV and its chances for success.   How is it doing?  What is needed for breakout success?

Panelists
Bill Sanders, VP Mobile Programming & Digital Development, Sony Pictures Television
Derek Broes, SVP Worldwide Business Development, Paramount Pictures
Steve Smith, Managing Director, Playboy TV International
Douglas Craig, SVP Digital Media Operations, Discovery Communications
Seamus McAteer, Chief Product Architect & Senior Analyst, Media Metrics
Moderator: Ted Cohen, Managing Partner, TAG Strategic

What are the gating factors for Mobile TV acceptance?

Hasn’t been an overwhelming response for adopting Mobile TV.  Insufficient marketing to consumers; marketing is not the carriers’ core competence, just as software development is not the core competence of studios.  The numbers are still small - one or two percent - of the mobile phone market in US and Europe, but it’s meaningful, and five to ten percent of the addressable market of video-capable handsets.  The combination of flat rate data with increasing video capable handset and YouTube-like free video should be powerful drivers of adoption.  If it’s free, everyone will try it at least once.

What are the major content and user interface issues?

Need to build products and services in the way that our kids want, not based on the constraints that we place on them.  Examples of limitations: content deleted after 24 hours, inability to pause and come back to content later.  Short form is performing better than long form, of course.  Foreign language is an issue - need dubbing, subtitles don’t work on mobile (Sony does subtitle, though).  Every panelist is doing a combination of repurposing existing and developing original content.

Whether long or short form, it’s about building habit — people returning to the brand again and again.  For example, Sony did 200 Ripley Believe It or Not clips.  Traditional carrier approach, put them all out there on the shelf and let them die a quiet death.  Bill is pushing to go back to original comic strip format, thirty seconds every day with a shelf life.  Perishability is important to drive habit building.  On YouTube, you want to be the person who discovers the clip and forwards it to your friends.  This is something that we should have learned from traditional media.

On digital rights, the most important lesson is that the consumer will do what’s convenient whether it’s legal or not; we need to get in front of the needs and offer what consumers want legally.  Should you ask for permission first or forgiveness later?  With talent, ask for permission.  In other cases, bias toward asking for forgiveness.

What will make Mobile TV prime-time, with DVR- and HD-like uptake?

Forcing the issue on studios and other content owners by device users figuring out how to get the content on the devices.  These mobile devices increasingly have the capability of PCs, access to broadband networks, and the ability to sync with PCs.

What about the opportunity for direct-to-consumer, internet / browser based mobile portals, bypassing operators?

Hard to market and reach consumers without carrier support.  However, YouTube has some success in mobile.  Operators are very concerned about this, want to stay well ahead of it.  Also, trying to convince carriers that they can be “smart pipes” without being the programmer, e.g. billing relationship.