<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Googleville is Happy Tonight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalpodcast.com/podcastnews/2008/02/02/why-googleville-is-happy-tonight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalpodcast.com/podcastnews/2008/02/02/why-googleville-is-happy-tonight/</link>
	<description>Digital Podcast focuses on using new and social media to build real businesses.  We help publishers build new media businesses that use best practices to market content, build audience and monetize the results.  Give us a call at 562-824-5193.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpodcast.com/podcastnews/2008/02/02/why-googleville-is-happy-tonight/#comment-72038</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpodcast.com/podcastnews/2008/02/02/why-googleville-is-happy-tonight/#comment-72038</guid>
		<description>I'm all for someone providing good competition for Google.  I'm constantly on  the look out for better ways to search, advertise and advertising networks to participate in.  Sadly, Yahoo and MS have been unable to do so as separate entities.  Now with a merger all their energy will go into reducing duplication, not innovating and beating Google.  They won't want to fund two search engines, two ad platforms etc so which will end up winning.  My guess is more open road for Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for someone providing good competition for Google.  I&#8217;m constantly on  the look out for better ways to search, advertise and advertising networks to participate in.  Sadly, Yahoo and MS have been unable to do so as separate entities.  Now with a merger all their energy will go into reducing duplication, not innovating and beating Google.  They won&#8217;t want to fund two search engines, two ad platforms etc so which will end up winning.  My guess is more open road for Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JameSEO.com</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpodcast.com/podcastnews/2008/02/02/why-googleville-is-happy-tonight/#comment-71989</link>
		<dc:creator>JameSEO.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 20:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpodcast.com/podcastnews/2008/02/02/why-googleville-is-happy-tonight/#comment-71989</guid>
		<description>Good article. I agree with what you say. I just hope Yahoo &#38; MSN reads this and want to prove you wrong...

"Combining two companies that DO NOT GET IT is NOT a recipe for competing with one that does."

This absolutely true. But optimistically, wouldn't it be nice if Yahoo &#38; MSN actually came up with something that allowed them to compete with the internet ruling Google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. I agree with what you say. I just hope Yahoo &amp; MSN reads this and want to prove you wrong&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Combining two companies that DO NOT GET IT is NOT a recipe for competing with one that does.&#8221;</p>
<p>This absolutely true. But optimistically, wouldn&#8217;t it be nice if Yahoo &amp; MSN actually came up with something that allowed them to compete with the internet ruling Google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
