<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iTunes Podcast Spotlight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalpodcast.com/podcastnews/2007/03/07/itunes-podcast-spotlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalpodcast.com/podcastnews/2007/03/07/itunes-podcast-spotlight/</link>
	<description>Digital Podcast focuses on using new and social media to build real businesses.  We help publishers build new media businesses that use best practices to market content, build audience and monetize the results.  Give us a call at 562-824-5193.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:29:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpodcast.com/podcastnews/2007/03/07/itunes-podcast-spotlight/comment-page-1/#comment-44511</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpodcast.com/podcastnews/2007/03/07/itunes-podcast-spotlight/#comment-44511</guid>
		<description>Speaking of design quality, in this case, interface and user cues, your &quot;related posts&quot; section might be tweaked to give the user a bit more useful information such as date of posting. The &quot;New iTunes...&quot; post is actually two years old. I&#039;m sure this is just a function of the database bringing up keyword hits but the timing is important. I happened to have read this less than a couple days after Apple released an iTunes update and I&#039;m sure others might have thought, as did I, that the new version had problems. Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of design quality, in this case, interface and user cues, your &#8220;related posts&#8221; section might be tweaked to give the user a bit more useful information such as date of posting. The &#8220;New iTunes&#8230;&#8221; post is actually two years old. I&#8217;m sure this is just a function of the database bringing up keyword hits but the timing is important. I happened to have read this less than a couple days after Apple released an iTunes update and I&#8217;m sure others might have thought, as did I, that the new version had problems. Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
