TALKING POLITICS show

TALKING POLITICS

Summary: Coronavirus! Climate! Brexit! Trump! Politics has never been more unpredictable, more alarming or more interesting: Talking Politics is the podcast that tries to make sense of it all. Every week David Runciman and Helen Thompson talk to the most interesting people around about the ideas and events that shape our world: from history to economics, from philosophy to fiction. What does the future hold? Can democracy survive? How crazy will it get? This is the political conversation that matters.Talking Politics is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books, Europe's leading magazine of books and ideas.

Join Now to Subscribe to this Podcast

Podcasts:

 New Year, New World? | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:52:52

David and Helen look at what's changed - and what hasn't - since we last spoke, from Brexit to Biden to Covid. Has the Brexit deal really given the UK a chance to do things differently? Do Democrat wins in the Georgia Senate races open up new possibilities for Biden? What is at stake in the politics of vaccination? Plus, we talk about where things now stand for the future of the Union. *Recorded before the events in Washington on Wednesday * Talking Points: What can the UK do that it couldn’t do before Brexit?  - From the start, the two biggest issues for Cameron were freedom of movement and financial services regulation. - For the City, Brexit is a tradeoff. Although financial services will not be regulated in the EU, the American investment banks in London are unhappy about being shut out of equivalence for trading. - Johnson is talking about innovation and dynamism. He doesn’t seem willing to say it’s about migration and the City of London. Northern Ireland and Scotland will both be key questions that we will talk about in greater depth this year. - There will be a growing sense of Northern Ireland’s separateness. The deal creates opportunities and risks for the government in Dublin. - A trade deal changes what Scottish independence would mean. Meanwhile, in the USA… the Democrats now have control of the Senate. - This election could indicate the potential of a remarkable new coalition for the Democratic party. - Or it could indicate a future where everything is contested. - What can Biden get done before the next midterms?  - During the Obama years, the Republicans were extremely effective at voting as an oppositional bloc.  - Holding the Democratic senators together won’t be easy and Biden will not be able to blame oppositional Republicans for any failure to get things done. - However a key benefit for the Democrats is that they will be able to confirm nominees. Mentioned in this Episode: - Matthew Parris in the Times - David’s winter talk: Did Covid kill the climate?  Further Learning: - From December… From Brexit to Scottish Independence - More on the partition of Ireland - More on the Georgia election results - More on the European vaccine rollout - From November… Post-Covid Economics with Adam Tooze And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

 How to Fix British Democracy? | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:28:44

Another recent talk by David on democracy: does it make sense to talk about fixing British democracy, and if so, how? David discusses electoral reform, institutional change and he returns to the question of votes for children.  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

 Did Covid Kill the Climate? | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:39:59

 A recording of a recent talk by David on what we've learned in 2020 about the resilience of democratic societies in the face of disaster. Has the experience of Covid shown us how we can deal with climate change, or has it shown us what we are missing? An argument about optimism, pessimism and everything in between.  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

 Looking Back, Looking Forward | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:45:58

This week David, Helen and our producer Catherine Carr look back at five years of podcasting and five years of crazy politics, to pick our favourite moments and to discuss what we've learned. From the 2015 general election to the current crisis, via the Corn Laws and Crashed, the politics of abortion and super forecasting, Corbyn and nuclear weapons. Plus, we'll let you know about some of our plans for 2021. Episodes Mentioned in this Episode:  - Crashed with Adam Tooze - Adam Tooze on post-COVID economics - The Corn Laws with Boyd Hilton - Another Shock! (From 2017) with Finbarr Livesey - The Talking Politics Guide… to Nuclear Weapons with Aaron Rapport - Superforecasting with David Spiegelhalter - American Histories: The Great Abortion Switcheroo with Sarah Churchwell - Catherine’s new podcast, Relatively. And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

 Where is the Opposition? | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:44:27

We look past Covid and Brexit to ask where the long-term opposition to Johnson's government is going to come from. Can Corbynism remain a force in British politics, even without Corbyn? Is there room for a challenge to the Conservatives from the right? Will climate politics drive street protest politics or can it help the Greens? Plus we consider whether Nicola Sturgeon is really the leader of the opposition. With Helen Thompson and Chris Brooke. Talking Points: Corbynist energy levels are low these days. - There is a strong Corbynist presence on Twitter and in certain media institutions, but it’s not clear that it extends far beyond those bubbles. - Much of the radical left politics in the near future will be defensive. When Starmer ran for leader, he essentially offered Corbynism without Corbyn. - The manifestos of 2017 and 2019 were popular inside the Labour Party and reasonably popular with the public.  - Corbyn did move the party out of New Labour’s shadow. Starmer has inherited a party that is firmly outside the New Labour mainstream. - Although some Corbynists fear a return to New Labour-esque politics, Labour now seems to be a social democratic party in the European mold.  Will the Green Party benefit from these developments? - Helen thinks that we are more likely to see increased green activism than a resurgence in Green Party politics. - Many on the left are disenchanted with parliamentary politics. - And over the last couple of years, the major parties have shifted on climate.  If Johnson is really committed to greener politics, does that open space on the right? - Farage is positioning himself in this gap. - This could intersect with a rebellion against lockdown. What should Starmer do about Scotland? - Could Starmer make a case that the democratic voice of the people of Scotland must be heard, and then make a social democratic case for the Union? - A more federal union is going to require stronger institutions in England, which is probably to Labour’s disadvantage.  - Time for the SNP to weaken is probably the best way forward for both unionist parties. Mentioned in this Episode: - This Land by Owen Jones Further Learning:  - James Butler on the Corbyn project for the LRB - More on Macron, the constitution, and climate politics - From our archives… Labour’s Fault Lines - A profile of Andy Burnham from The Guardian And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

 What's Next for France and Italy? | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:39:13

As we wait for a Brexit deal or no deal, we discuss what the next year might hold for French and Italian politics. What are Macron's prospects as he heads towards the next presidential election? Has Giorgia Meloni replaced Matteo Salvini as the leader of the Italian far right? And what chance of a return to political normalcy in either country? With Lucia Rubinelli and Chris Bickerton. Talking Points:  The Italian public is fed up with Brexit—there isn’t much public debate about it. - Salvini is still playing with the idea that leaving the EU is a good idea, but not as seriously now.  - All the signals from the government suggest that Italy is lining up with Macron, but they aren’t trying to play a central role. There are particular issues that affect different member states. The broader European unity is now being tested on certain key issues. - The Irish are particularly affected by no deal. - For France, the most important issue is probably the level playing field. Fishing also has a powerful symbolic element to it. - It may come down to member states being willing to make compromises with each other, or not.  Italy was the first Western country to be hit by the virus and the first to lockdown. The response created a sense of pride. - During summer, however, life went back to normal. It was basically a free-for-all. - When cases began to climb again, the mood turned to frustration: frustration at the relationship between governments and regions, and frustration with certain policies, such as the closure of high schools. - There is also the sense that Italy is lagging behind on the vaccine.  Macron also went in earlier on lockdown, and came out of lockdown earlier too.  - The idea that Macron has authoritarian tendencies has become part of the debate over COVID. There has been an almost permanent sense of emergency stretching from the yellow vest period to today. - COVID has blurred into a border debate about the balance between security and civil liberties in France. Mentioned in this Episode: - Our last episode with Lucia Further Learning:  - More on Johnson’s dinner with von der Leyen  - Why is fishing important in the Brexit trade talks? - More on Article 24 in France - A profile of Giorgia Meloni from Politico Europe - More on France’s Green Party And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

 From Brexit to Scottish Independence | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:43:53

We try to join the dots from the final days of the Brexit negotiations to the looming prospect of another referendum on Scottish independence. Can the government really risk a no-deal outcome? Will the SNP still hold a referendum if the courts say no? What will Labour do? Plus we ask how COVID politics intersects with the fate of the Union. With Helen Thompson, Anand Menon and Kenneth Armstrong. Talking Points: Will there be a Brexit deal? - We know the concessions both sides would have to make. What we don’t know whether either side is willing to make the concessions. - The negotiation that matters is perhaps the one going on in the prime minister’s head. - Debates over lockdown have reopened the space to the Conservative Party’s right. - The Eurozone faces its own problem: trying to rescue the EU Recovery Fund from the impasse over the rule of law issue in relation to Hungary and Poland.  The Union is in a more precarious position than it was before. - The SNP is doing surprisingly well. That gives Sturgeon some comfort in thinking that she can seek a mandate for another referendum if she wins a majority. - How will they go about the referendum? Some people are floating the possibility of the Scottish parliament legislating for another referendum without the Section 30 order that would get consent from the UK. - For people like Michael Gove, Scotland is a key reason to get a Brexit deal. There is undeniably support for independence in opinion polls, but can the SNP offer a coherent independence project? - Helen thinks that they still haven’t resolved the currency question. There’s also the border issue. - Can the SNP accept an independent Scotland outside of the European Union? Membership has been a key part of the independence offer.  - Will timing favor the SNP or Westminster?  Brexit and Scotland are problems for Keir Starmer too. - How will Starmer whip his MP’s to vote if a Brexit deal comes back?  - Labour without seats from Scotland will find it hard to win another election. - Ultimately, the major economic event of this parliament is going to be Brexit, not COVID, or at least it will be close, so Labour needs to come up with some kind of narrative. - Labour’s strength in Scotland bound the Union together. It hasn’t come back since 2011. This makes it hard for any party other than the Conservatives to be dominant in Westminster, particularly under conditions of asymmetrical devolution.   Mentioned in this Episode: - The UK in a Changing Europe - Alex Massie on the SNP Further Learning:  - From the archives… Can Boris Survive Brexit?  - More on Starmer and the Brexit deal And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

 Young People vs Joe Biden | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:52:50

This week we talk about race and representation with Cathy Cohen of the GenForward Survey project based in Chicago. What do young Americans want from democratic politics? How do their priorities vary according to race and ethnicity? And can a Biden presidency deliver on the desire for real change? Plus we catch up with Jeevun Sandher and Michael Bankole of the Politics Jam podcast to explore a UK perspective on why young and minority voices find it so hard to be heard. Talking Points: We are seeing more racial and ethnic diversity in generations than ever before. - Young people break for Biden, but for young white men, it was about 50-50. - In 2012, a plurality of young whites voted for Romney. If we look only at generation we miss part of the story. - The story about ‘young people’ is being driven by young people of colour. Does Biden have a problem with young people? - Many young people voted against Trump rather than for Biden. - They decided to vote against Trump and organize against Biden. - What is the best method for achieving racial progress in the US? Young African Americans are pointing to the need for structural change. - Young people are rejecting the idea that change comes from national-level voting. They are redefining what democratic practice might be. Young people broadly favor a more expansive state. - The Biden agenda is more about tweaking at the edges. - There is going to be a real tension. Will there be the infrastructure to mobilize young people? Can they pressure the administration? - This generation is highly educated, but they are also precarious. There is an increasing mismatch between the promise of higher education and what it delivers. - The younger generation is highly indebted because of higher education. In both the UK and the US, young people haven’t been represented well by the political system. - There are specific issues that young people want to see addressed, including systemic racism. - Ethnic differences among young people need to be taken into account in the UK too. - The political class in the House of Commons is unrepresentative in many ways. It skews old and it skews white. - Conservatives tend to represent white seats. The First-Past-the-Post system doesn’t incentivize serious engagement with ethnically diverse constituencies. Mentioned in this episode: - The GenForward Survey - The Black Youth Project - Politics JaM - Jeevun’s academic profile - Michael’s academic profile - Anne Phillips, The Politics of Presence - Thomas Saalfeld on substantive representation And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

 James O'Brien | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:59:54

David talks to author and radio host James O'Brien about everything from therapy to Brexit and from educational privilege to Keir Starmer's leadership of the Labour Party. Recorded as part of the Cambridge Literary Festival https://cambridgeliteraryfestival.com/. James's new book is How Not to be Wrong: The Art of Changing Your Mind.  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

  Post-Covid Economics | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:45:25

This week a special edition from the Bristol Festival of Economics with Helen Thompson and Adam Tooze talking about what might follow the pandemic. From vaccines to changing patterns of employment, from action on climate to new tensions with China, we explore what the long-term effects of 2020 might be. Plus we discuss what options are open to a Biden administration: with the Georgia run-offs to come and the disease still spreading, how much wriggle room has he got? Talking Points:  Headlines about the COVID vaccines focus on effectiveness, but it’s also about supply chains, storage, and scale. - Things are moving so quickly right now in part because so many people, especially in the US, are getting sick. After the initial financial meltdown in March, in aggregate terms there was a share market recovery—one which was at odds with what was going on with people’s lives. - Surging American unemployment numbers went alongside the S&P 500’s continued rise. - The biggest beneficiaries initially were big tech. Now big pharma seems to be gaining.  - Is there a structural conflict in the allocation of capital between big tech and big pharma?  - Big tech probably won’t be facing much of a challenge from the White House. The Biden administration will be embroiled in crisis politics from Day 1. - The epidemic in the US right now looks terrifying, and Thanksgiving is on the horizon. - The logic of economic crisis management is about time.  - The Democrats are going to have a hard time getting things through Congress, and the fact that things are so hard will divide them further.  The Biden Administration will make early moves on climate. - It will be hard for Biden to take climate seriously without some kind of detente with China, but getting there is hard to imagine.  After the health crisis ends, some jobs might not come back. - The effectiveness of short-term working means that the unemployment crisis has not yet hit in Europe. - The US unemployment crisis is in full swing. So far, the bounce back has been relatively quick. But there will be a manifest social crisis.  There are imaginably worse pandemics than this one, and yet we have responded in an almost unimaginable way. - This is a highly mediatized, diffuse threat that has acquired huge salience.  - This is the most extraordinary thing that has happened in modern economic history.  - A lot of this unprecedented response was voluntary. Mentioned in this Episode:  - Biden’s piece in Foreign Affairs - Paul Krugman’s latest piece for the NYTimes - Our last episode with Adam Further Learning: - The NYTimes’ COVID vaccine tracker - More on China’s pledge to become carbon neutral by 2060 - https://www.ideasfestival.co.uk/themes/festival-economics And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

 War: What Is it Good For? | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:37:59

We talk to the historian Margaret MacMillan about the changing character of war, from the ancient world to the twenty-first century. Do we still understand the risks? Where are the conflicts of the future likely to break out? And how can we reconcile the terrible destructiveness of war with its capacity to bring about positive change? Plus we talk about why war produces so much great art. Talking Points: Is the way we commemorate war distancing us from the reality of it?  - Those who have seen war tend to be wary of it. - There is complacency in a number of countries that war is something that ‘we’ don’t do anymore. War is terrible, yet so much of the innovation that we value seems intertwined with it. - For many people WWI exemplifies the futility of war, yet many of the things we value came out of that war, particularly political and institutional change.  - WWI essentially gave Europe modern welfare states and universal suffrage. - The two world wars also led to much greater social equality. - There seems to be a deep connection between peace and inequality, and violence and equality. But it might depend on what countries and what wars you look at. If war is connected to innovation because it is so wasteful you cannot recreate those conditions. - Perhaps we are doing something similar with COVID, but climate change is the true existential crisis. - Climate change does not seem to be a unifying crisis. - Declaring ‘war’ on an abstraction is dangerous. How do you know when it’s over? Wars on abstractions are wars without limits. Templates from the past don’t fully apply to the US-China relationship. - There is the nuclear element, which should hypothetically rule out war. - There’s also the energy resource conflict question: China has been able to take responsibility for its own energy security. - In the long run, it is in the interests of both the US and China to cooperate with each other. The problem is the political factor. Mentioned in this Episode: - Margaret MacMillan, War: How Conflict Shaped Us - General Nick Carter’s interview with Sky News - Walter Scheidel, The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century - Rana Mitter, China’s Good War - ‘La Grande Illusion’ - Tim O’Brien, The Things They Carried - ‘Apocalypse Now’ Further Learning:  - Margaret MacMillan, Paris 1919 - Talking Politics History of Ideas: Max Weber on Leadership - More on tensions between Egypt and Ethiopia And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

 President Biden | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:30:38

Now that we have a result, David and Helen reflect on what the next four years might hold. What issues could define a Biden presidency? Has this election indicated a possible realignment of American politics? And is it enough to restore faith in democratic politics? If Trump is not how democracy ends, where does the real danger lie? Talking Points: Biden faces three big issues: China, climate, and COVID. - It’s probably not possible to go back to US-China relations pre-Trump. However, China does perceive this election as significant. - Making climate a priority has implications for the China relationship. This was too close to be a realignment election. Both parties turned out their vote because they had oppositional energy. - But there are shifts within. Florida went red, but people voted to increase the minimum wage. California went blue, but people voted to resist the unionization of essentially Lyft and Uber workers. - Trump has opened up the possibility for a more cross-racial, working class Republican Party. These shifts are still small, but it will be hard for them to go back to being a party of tax cuts for the rich, deregulation, and cultural conservatism. - It’s more complicated for the Democrats. There has been a shift to the left, but there are also deep divisions in the party. A lot of the ‘Trump is how democracy ends story’ didn’t add up. How can American democracy have been so vulnerable, and yet so easily restored?    - The threats to democracy: COVID, climate, and China, don’t fit electoral cycles. - American democracy faces huge medium to long term challenges; too much energy has gone into short term risks. - Trump has allowed people to close their eyes to deeper structural problems. Trump’s presidency did have serious geopolitical implications. - He changed American policy on China; most of the political class now regards China as a serious strategic rival. - He changed relations with Iran, and, in doing so, relations with Europe. - He pulled the US out of the Paris Climate Accord. Mentioned in this Episode: - China, climate, COVID: the new energy map - David’s book, How Democracy Ends - David on TP: How Democracy Ends - Joe Biden’s victory speech Further Learning: - Biden’s endorsement interview with the NYTimes (on big tech and other things) - Talking Politics American Histories: Monopoly and Muckraking - Stacey Abrams’ fight for a fair vote, from The New Yorker And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

 What Just Happened? | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:52:17

David, Helen and Gary convene on very little sleep to try to make sense of another extraordinary election. Though we still don't know who won, we do know that some things are going to get even harder for American democracy. What's the nightmare scenario: the loser refusing to lose, or the winner being unable to govern? Why did the pollsters get it wrong again? And what's likely to happen when the contest reaches the courts? Plus we ask if the American Constitution can cope with close elections any more. Relevant Episodes: From our Mini-Series: - History of Ideas on Tocqueville and American democracy - American Histories: The 15th and the 19th  - American Histories: Deporting Mexicans  - American Histories: The Great Abortion Switcheroo  Old Episodes on Trump: - What Trump Means to Us - One-term presidents  - Can America Cope - American Fascism: Then and Now  - America First?  - Michael Lewis on Donald Trump (And Michael Lewis Updated) - Trump and History  A Broader Perspective on US Politics: - The Talking Politics Guide to … the US Constitution  - Police State USA - Adam Tooze on US vs. China  - Judith Butler: Then and Now  - Where Power Stops - The Talking Politics Guide to… the Gilded Age - Inaugurals  From the LRB - David for the LRB reviewing Fear  - David for the LRB reviewing Ben Rhodes’ memoir  - David’s review of the Mueller report for the LRB - David for the LRB in Dec 2016: Is this how democracy ends?  - David on American democracy: How can it work?  - Adam Tooze for LRB: Whose century?  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

 Are Young People Losing Faith in Democracy? | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:27:50

David talks to Roberto Foa about his recent report into young people's attitude to democracy around the world. Why are millennials so much less satisfied with democratic politics than older generations? Can populist politics do anything to alter that? And what does the generation divide tell us about changing attitudes to Trump? Plus we discuss the generational politics of climate change, education and wealth inequality.  The report in full: https://www.cam.ac.uk/system/files/youth_and_satisfaction_with_democracy.pdf  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

 China, Climate, Covid: The New Energy Map | File Type: audio/mpeg | Duration: 00:31:31

A conversation with Pulitzer Prize-winning author Daniel Yergin about the new energy map of the world. What impact has the shale revolution had on global politics? Is China winning or losing the energy wars? And will the energy transition happen fast enough for climate change? Daniel's book: www.waterstones.com/book/the-new-map/daniel-yergin/9780241472347 Helen on oil: play.acast.com/s/talkingpolitics/oil-  See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Comments

Login or signup comment.