We’re Not Safe Anymore

 

At first, I was going to entitle this post, I don’t feel safe anymore. But then I realized that relying on feelings can be a risky business. We may react to situations based on our feelings, but when it’s time to make decisions, we should also trust our rational minds. And my rational mind told me it was time to act.

A few years ago, my husband and I purchased guns, were trained in their use, and even practiced on the range every two weeks. Over time, I became more confident with the gun, and at the urging of my husband, I agreed to become qualified for concealed carry, and he did the same. As a small woman, I decided to buy a special purse that would not be as convenient as wearing the gun on my person, but at least I wouldn’t have to change my whole wardrobe. (It’s important for the gun not to imprint on your body.) I carried the gun a few times, but then my serious health issues got in the way. We stopped practicing and carrying.

Stabbing at “Counter-Jihad” Event in Mannheim

 

At least six people were wounded after a stabbing attack at an event in a city square in Mannheim, Germany. Those injured include a police officer, the assailant (who was stopped only by police gunfire), and activist Michael Stürzenberger—a self-described “Islam-critical journalist,” who led the German Freedom Party before its dissolution in favor of the better-known Alternative for Germany (AfD).

The small rally held in the Marketplaz downtown square was organized in part by the Citizens’ Movement Pax Europa (BPE), an organization commited to stopping the “increasing spread and influence of political Islam.” Stürzenberger was reportedly readying to speak in front of a crowd when the stabbings began.

QOTD: Recognition

 

Don’t worry when you are not recognized, but strive to be worthy of recognition. — Abraham Lincoln

We all have goals: We want to matter. We want to be important. We want to have freedom and power to pursue our creative work. We want respect from our peers and recognition for our accomplishments. Not out of vanity or selfishness, but of an earnest desire to fulfill our personal potential. — Ryan Holiday

Success and Its Parasites

 

Yesterday’s travesty in NYC is a result of the parasites taking over their host organism.  Instapundit made the astute observation that any successful host will attract parasites.  So long as the host (in this case the American judicial system) retained the traits that made it respected, and therefore successful, it could withstand the parasites.  Now, however, the host has been overwhelmed and corrupted.

In this case, the obvious abuses of the Democrats running the Trump trial means that when we are on the other side of the conflagration the Fascist Democrats ignited. We are tasked with putting together a reconstituted legal system, one in which prosecutors and judges will have a lot less leeway; one where they must face substantially greater punishment for abusing their power.  How and what it will be, I don’t know.  But every other time something like this has happened before, the result is tighter rules on those in previously-trusted roles.

“Of What Was Donald Trump Convicted?”

 

This is the question I intend to ask anyone who gloats about the conviction. It’s the question media should be asking the politicians unctuously proclaiming, “No one is above the law.”

I had written a long post on the decline of the American legal system since I went to law school 45 years ago. Especially regarding the erosion of the expectation that an accuser identify and substantiate the accusations before requiring the accused to guess and to mount a defense based on that guess. But I decided posting that would not help my wellbeing, nor would it be as helpful to overall discussion as I initially hoped.

Better Living Through Chemistry

 

I have had many friends who chose “natural” remedies, and died from something that was otherwise curable. Nature is perfectly happy if we are dead. Nature is no friend.

As readers know, I believe from my understanding of the Torah that we are here, instead, to improve nature. And because I try to maintain consistency between my beliefs and my practices, you will not hear me say, “Oh, it is natural, so it is better.” I refuse to romanticize a natural world that is absent the contributions of mankind, which means that I will not hesitate to use invasive species of trees or bushes. Similarly, I am more than happy to spray to eliminate mosquitos and ticks on my land.

In writing his memoir, Glenn Loury recognized the game that would go on between author and reader. To get his audience to trust him as a person, he’d confess his past misdeed and defects in character; to gain your confidence in his integrity as a thinker, he’d have to acknowledge the many times he’s changed his mind on the stances he’s taken. Today he joins to James, Rob and Steve Hayward to explain himself.

The hosts also consider the broken pier in Gaza, compare this administration’s incompetence with past calamities, plus last weekend’s IDF strike in Rafah and the tent camp fire.

Who Gets the Credit? 

 

Most paternity suits over inventions and ideas are matters of judgment and of degree. Of course, readers and audiences like clear cut stories of little guy inventors versus big, thieving corporations, stories with triumphant, stand-up-and-cheer courtroom verdict scenes. There are some in real life, but lots of inventions—the telephone and television, and in this post, lasers and computers—had several near-simultaneous inventors with competing patent claims. Fighting and negotiating those claims—to academic promotions, to prestige, to big money, and to lasting fame—has a long history.

The two accepted genres of laser history are: Gordon Gould invented it in his attic, had his 1957 notebook notarized, and spent 30 years fighting to Stop the Steal. The other genre is, eminent scientist Charles Townes leads Bell Labs in a brilliant collective effort to imagine the laser into existence, despite the sad later efforts of gadflies with dubious prior claims to its invention. What are the essential features of a laser? As Hannibal Lecter might say, first things, Clarice. One guy’s claim has essential features 1,2,4,6, and 9. The other one, the winning application, has features 1,2,3,5,7, and 8. It’s like a Hollywood lawsuit: At what exact point does a generic idea become a copyrightable original one? What standards apply?

QOTD: The Hard Part is the Second Time

 

Anne Lamott has done a rather cool thing for decades now.  At the end of every book, she invites people to visit her church, Saint Andrew Presbyterian Church in Marin City, California.

When my wife and I were writing a blog about visiting churches, we took her up on the offer. During the church’s greeting time, Anne made an effort to greet all the visitors, knowing that they may have come because of her invitation. She told us we had to stay after church to try her friend Gail’s “world famous potato salad” at their potluck.

If you’ve read Lamott, you know that she isn’t a fan of Republicans, especially Trump (though previously it was especially Bush, and if they had won it likely would have been especially McCain or Romney.) But she does seem to really love Jesus. And I appreciate her promotion of her church.

Cook Political Report’s Amy Walter returns to the podcast to break down the latest findings from her 2024 Swing State Project. She explains voters’ thoughts and expectations on the economy; provides analysis of the low Undecided/high third party numbers; and offers her take on the Democrats’ scramble to keep its diverse base on the party premises.

Plus, Henry dives into a multi-decadal series of “Right Direction/Wrong Track” polling results to give us a sense of what it might mean for  November; and he takes a look at John Avlon’s deft pitch for partisan Ds and moderate Rs in New York’s red 1st Congressional District.

How can the Judge tell me as a Juror, what I can and cannot take into account in deliberations?

 

When I sat on a jury, one of the charges was what we could and could not take into account. They wanted us to look at the facts of the case. In this case, there was a directed verdict because the law was so very clear. We just had to debate if there should have been an award (so we said) and how much (held up on appeal, so we were apparently in the right).

However, one of the defendants on the stand was so clearly a long-term alcoholic to my eyes, it lent a lot of credence to the testimony of the plaintiff regarding the other man’s behavior. In short, the accusations against the defendant that he behaved like a belligerent drunk were totally believable.

We publish as the Trump fraud trial in NY enters its second day of deliberations. So, we get right to the matter at hand with famed defense attorney Alan Dershowitz.

Plus a look at the circus inside and outside of the courtroom and, of course, the Parting Shot.

Deliberations Done for the Day

 

The jury in Donald Trump’s NY trial received jury instructions this morning, began deliberations around 11:30am ET and were dismissed shortly after 4pm.

Jurors were told not to discuss the case with anyone and not to visit sites or read accounts of the case.

This week on The Learning Curve co-hosts U-Arkansas Prof. Albert Cheng and DFER’s Alisha Searcy interview Harvard student Maya Shiloni. Ms. Shiloni discusses her Israeli upbringing, academic journey at Harvard, and experiences as a world-class dancer. She addresses leadership crises in higher education, religious toleration, and the impact of the October 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel. In closing, Shiloni also highlights her aim to bridge understanding on American campus issues and international conflicts.

Maya Shiloni is an Israeli-American student at Harvard College studying Government and Economics with a citation in Arabic. She is an opinion editor with The Crimson, Harvard’s leading student newspaper. In 2023, Maya interned for Knesset Member Meirav Cohen, and this summer, she will be working for Congressman Josh Gottheimer. She is also three-time gold medalist at the Dance World Cup, the largest international dance competition.

Back in the USSR

 

We are coming up on 33 years from the collapse of the Soviet Union on December 25th, 1991. That specific event merits an anniversary of sorts, even as it was the culmination of a long, drawn out denouement and thus the date would be entirely arbitrary as a landmark.  Decay and rot had accelerated through the decades leading to the 1990s, known in Russian parlance as the period of stagnation (zastoi).  Change thus occurred in the two ways well described by Mike Campbell in Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises: both gradually and then suddenly.

Some two decades earlier the dissident Andrei Amalrik had pondered whether the Soviet Union could survive until 1984.  His answer became known as the Amalrik paradox: “In order for the Soviet Union to survive it will need to change; but if it changes, it will no longer survive.”

This month, a rare event: a Pod-less pod, with Rob and Jonah taking sole command of the GLoP bridge. But there’s still plenty to talk about, including a big announcement for Rob, some thoughts about The Fall Guy, the boys have dinner in NYC, a little archeological rank punditry (yes, there is such a thing), get slightly scatological (again), and too off their heads rambling to list here.

Asymmetric Justice in Gaza

 

The political situation in Gaza has taken a not-unexpected turn for the worse. Israel is conducting operations in Rafah, where, contrary to widespread expectations, it has done much to overcome the logistical nightmare of evacuating and then feeding close to a million Palestinians in Gaza, supplying some 542,570 tons of aid and 28,255 aid trucks, as reported by the Wall Street Journal. Meanwhile, Hamas does what it can to wreck that operation, and Egypt remains adamant in penning up the Palestinians in Rafah, which only increases the time, costs, and risks of military operations.

But conditions on the ground seem to have little effect on the political controversies that surround that action, coming from both the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and many Western governments, including—on and off—the Biden administration. In both cases, the basic message is the same. As to Hamas, the ICJ said in its order that it is “deeply troubling” that Hamas disregarded its call “for [the] immediate and unconditional release” of the hostages. Hamas will not do so at any time and is not under any diplomatic pressure to comply. So, it is the other half of the judgment that carries all the weight. The ICJ also ordered Israel to:

Trump Economy And Regular Americans

 

I keep seeing the media present the case that Trump only helped the 1% and did nothing to help regular Americans.  That assertion is demonstrably untrue.

Let’s look at real (inflation adjusted) median wages.   (Expressed in 1984 dollars.)

Boys Will Be Boys

 

Why do sharks take bites out of people? Standard Answer: sharks don’t eat people, silly! They just confuse those legs for seals.

How do we know? Do we run post-chomping interviews, like in a reality TV show, and ask the shark, “Gee, what were you thinking when you decided to sample Jennifer’s legs?”

Trump Defense Wraps Closing Arguments In NY Case

 

Donald Trump’s lead defense attorney Todd Blanche went first in Tuesday’s closing remarks in the election interference case brought by New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg. Hinging largely on the testimony of former Trump attorney Michael Cohen, a convicted felon, Blanche took aim at Cohen’s dubious credibility. 

“Michael Cohen is the GLOAT. He’s literally the greatest liar of all time,” Blanche told jurors.